Skip Navigation



JAC Advance Access published online on April 9, 2008

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dkn157
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
62/1/172    most recent
dkn157v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nørgaard, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sørensen, H. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nørgaard, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sørensen, H. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Original research

Maternal use of fluconazole and risk of congenital malformations: a Danish population-based cohort study

Mette Nørgaard1,*, Lars Pedersen1, Mette Gislum1, Rune Erichsen1, Kirstine Kobberøe Søgaard1, Henrik Carl Schønheyder2 and Henrik Toft Sørensen1

1 Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark 2 Department of Clinical Microbiology, Aalborg Hospital, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark

Received 14 January 2008; returned 12 March 2008; revised 5 February 2008; accepted 14 March 2008


* Corresponding author. Tel: +45-99-32-69-03; E-mail: m.noergaard{at}rn.dk

Objectives: Fluconazole is widely used for the treatment of candidiasis. Although the drug is also prescribed to pregnant women, data on the safety of use of fluconazole during pregnancy are limited. We examined the association between the maternal use of fluconazole during pregnancy and the risk of congenital malformations.

Patients and methods: In this population-based cohort study in Northern Denmark, we included 1079 women who had a live birth or a stillbirth after the 20th week of gestation and who redeemed at least one prescription for fluconazole during the first trimester. The reference cohort comprised 170 453 pregnant women who redeemed no fluconazole prescription during pregnancy. The women were identified through the Danish Medical Birth Registry. Data on drug use, birth outcome and covariates were extracted from population-based healthcare databases. We used logistic regression to estimate the prevalence odds ratio (POR) for congenital malformations after fluconazole exposure, while adjusting for maternal smoking, parity, maternal age and concurrent prescriptions for antiepileptics or antidiabetics.

Results: Among 1079 women who filled a fluconazole prescription during the first trimester, 797 (74%) received a total of 150 mg of fluconazole, 235 (22%) received 300 mg of fluconazole, 24 (2%) received 350 mg of fluconazole and 23 (2%) received 600 mg of fluconazole. These women gave birth to 44 (4.1%) children with congenital malformations. The 170 453 women without fluconazole prescriptions gave birth to 6152 (3.6%) children with congenital malformations. For congenital malformations overall, the adjusted POR associated with the first-trimester fluconazole use was 1.0 (95% confidence interval: 0.8–1.4).

Conclusions: We found no overall increased risk of congenital malformations after exposure to short-course treatment with fluconazole in early pregnancy.

Key Words: drug safety , pregnancy , antifungals , epidemiology


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
cfpHome page
D. Soong and A. Einarson
Vaginal yeast infections during pregnancy
Can Fam Physician, March 1, 2009; 55(3): 255 - 256.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.