Skip Navigation



JAC Advance Access published online on April 15, 2008

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dkn151
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
62/1/126    most recent
dkn151v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nys, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nys, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Original research

Trends in antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolates from urology services in The Netherlands (1998–2005)

Sita Nys*, Peter H. Terporten, Jacomina A. A. Hoogkamp-Korstanje, Ellen E. Stobberingh on behalf of the Susceptibility Surveillance Study Group

Department of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands

Received 14 January 2008; returned 12 February 2008; revised 10 March 2008; accepted 10 March 2008


* Corresponding author. Tel: +31-43-3876647; Fax: +31-43-3876643; E-mail: snij{at}lmib.azm.nl

Objectives: An increase in antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli, the most common pathogen in urinary tract infections (UTIs), is encountered worldwide. Optimal treatment of UTIs will contribute substantially to limit antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance. This study determined trends in antimicrobial resistance of uropathogenic E. coli, which can be of use to optimize UTI guidelines.

Methods: During 1998–2005, E. coli from urine samples of patients attending urology services were collected in three regions in The Netherlands: north-east (NE, n = 1084), west (W, n = 1064) and south (S, n = 1212). The antibiotic susceptibility was determined using microbroth dilution following CLSI guidelines. E. coli ATCC 35218 and ATCC 25922 were used as reference strains.

Results: Amoxicillin resistance remained stable over time (37% to 47%), but was higher in the south (44%) compared with the other regions (40%; P < 0.02). Resistance to piperacillin increased from 4% (1998) to 32% (2005; P < 0.001), and resistance to fluoroquinolones increased from 6% to 13% (P < 0.01). Interregional differences were observed for resistance to piperacillin (NE 10%, W 12%, S 14%; P < 0.05) and to fluoroquinolones (NE 7%, W 13%, S 8%; P < 0.001). Trimethoprim ± sulfamethoxazole resistance remained stable (27% to 37%), as did that of nitrofurantoin (4% to 9%). The percentage of strains with multidrug resistance (resistance to three or more groups of antibiotics) for each region increased over time (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Antibiotic resistance was fairly constant over time for most agents tested, except for piperacillin and the fluoroquinolones. Regional differences were observed for several compounds. National and regional surveillance of antibiotic resistance is important to keep therapeutic guidelines up-to-date and adequate for the treatment of resistant microorganisms.

Key Words: antimicrobial resistance surveillance , Enterobacteriaceae , multidrug resistance , urinary tract


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.