Skip Navigation



JAC Advance Access published online on April 1, 2008

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dkn134
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
62/1/137    most recent
dkn134v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Papaparaskevas, J.
Right arrow Articles by Avlamis, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Papaparaskevas, J.
Right arrow Articles by Avlamis, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Original research

Moxifloxacin resistance is prevalent among Bacteroides and Prevotella species in Greece

Joseph Papaparaskevas1,*, Angeliki Pantazatou2, Anastasia Katsandri1,2, Dimitra P. Houhoula1, Nicholas J. Legakis1, Athanassios Tsakris1 and Athina Avlamis2

1 Department of Microbiology, Medical School, University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece 2 Department of Microbiology, Laikon University Hospital, 11527 Athens, Greece

Received 29 November 2007; returned 2 February 2008; revised 14 February 2008; accepted 5 March 2008


* Corresponding author. Tel: +30-210-7462142; Fax: +30-210-7462143; E-mail: ipapapar{at}med.uoa.gr

Objectives: Moxifloxacin is recommended in the empirical treatment of infections involving Gram-negative anaerobes. However, current European data regarding its activity against anaerobic pathogens are limited. In order to evaluate its potency, we comparatively studied the activity of moxifloxacin against recently isolated Gram-negative anaerobes.

Methods: Four hundred and ninety-five Gram-negative anaerobic clinical isolates (296 Bacteroides fragilis group, 58 non-fragilis Bacteroides spp. and 141 Prevotella spp.) were prospectively recovered in six Greek hospitals. Moxifloxacin MICs were determined in comparison with those of penicillin, piperacillin/tazobactam, cefoxitin, imipenem, metronidazole and clindamycin.

Results: Overall moxifloxacin MIC50 and MIC90 were 2 and 32 mg/L, respectively. Based on the current CLSI breakpoints (susceptible, ≤2 mg/L; resistant, ≥8 mg/L), almost half of the total isolates (49%) were non-susceptible to moxifloxacin (32% resistant; 17% intermediate). This was more evident among the non-fragilis Bacteroides species, where 47% of the isolates were resistant and 14% intermediate to moxifloxacin. Species variation was noticed, with the highest non-susceptible rates detected among Prevotella oralis (90%), Prevotella bivia (80%), Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron (75%), Bacteroides uniformis (70%) and Bacteroides capillosus (67%) species. Among the 19 (4%) isolates that were metronidazole non-susceptible (MIC ≥ 16 mg/L), only 4 (21%) were additionally non-susceptible to moxifloxacin.

Conclusions: High resistance rates to moxifloxacin among Bacteroides and Prevotella spp. were recorded, exceeding those previously reported in Europe and contraindicating its use as monotherapy for infections involving Gram-negative anaerobes without prior microbiological confirmation. For empirical usage, moxifloxacin should be combined with metronidazole in order to cover for these pathogens.

Key Words: metronidazole , susceptibility , anaerobes , epidemiology , Bacteroides spp. , Prevotella spp.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.