Skip Navigation



JAC Advance Access published online on January 25, 2008

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dkm510
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
61/3/714    most recent
dkm510v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nguyen, L. H.
Right arrow Articles by Wong-Beringer, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nguyen, L. H.
Right arrow Articles by Wong-Beringer, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Reducing empirical use of fluoroquinolones for Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections improves outcome

Lee H. Nguyen1, Donald I. Hsu2, Vaidyanathan Ganapathy3, Kimberly Shriner4 and Annie Wong-Beringer3,4,*

1 Loma Linda University, School of Pharmacy, Loma Linda, CA, USA 2 Western University, Pomona, CA, USA 3 University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA 4 Huntington Hospital, Pasadena, CA, USA

Received 10 August 2007; returned 4 December 2007; revised 11 October 2007; accepted 5 December 2007


* Correspondence address. University of Southern California, School of Pharmacy, 1985 Zonal Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA. Tel: +1-323-442-1356; Fax: +1-626-628-3024; E-mail: anniew{at}usc.edu

Background: We previously reported ciprofloxacin resistance (CR) and empirical use of fluoroquinolones as predictors of mortality in patients infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a case–control study. Here, we assessed the clinical impact of reducing empirical fluoroquinolone use for P. aeruginosa infections in hospitalized patients by performing a follow-up study in 2005–06 [period 2 (P2)] and comparing this with prior data from 2001–02 [period 1 (P1)].

Methods: Medical charts of infected patients who received at least 72 h of antibiotic therapy were reviewed. Patients were subgrouped based on the susceptibility of infected strains into the CR or ciprofloxacin-susceptible group. Antibiograms, patient and treatment variables and outcome measures were compared between groups and between study periods.

Results: Study patients were elderly (median age, 76 years), had a median of three co-morbidities and a median APACHE II score of 13. Most (75%) had pneumonia or urosepsis. Empirical use of fluoroquinolones was reduced by 30% in P2 versus P1, with a corresponding 39% increase in piperacillin/tazobactam use. The resultant positive impact observed in the CR group during P2 includes shortened delay to receipt of effective therapy (1 versus 3.5 days, P < 0.0001), reduced length of stay (13 versus 16 days, P = 0.03) and 2-fold lower mortality (9% versus 22%, P = 0.05). Susceptibility of P. aeruginosa improved by 10% to all antipseudomonal agents tested.

Conclusions: In settings where high rates of fluoroquinolone resistance exist, use of non-fluoroquinolone-based empirical regimens for P. aeruginosa infections improves patient outcomes and organism susceptibility over time.

Key Words: fluoroquinolone resistance , reduced mortality , prescribing changes


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.