Skip Navigation



JAC Advance Access published online on September 12, 2007

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dkm328
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
60/5/1080    most recent
dkm328v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ullmann, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Schmitt, H.-J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ullmann, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Schmitt, H.-J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Efficacy of posaconazole and amphotericin B in experimental invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in dexamethasone immunosuppressed rats

Andrew J. Ullmann1,*, Erik Krammes1, Sita Sommer1, Ines Buschmann1, Bernhard Jahn-Muehl2, Anthony Cacciapuoti3 and Heinz-Josef Schmitt4

1 3rd Medical Department, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany 2 Horst Schmidt Klinik, Wiesbaden, Germany 3 Schering-Plough Research Institute, Kenilworth, NJ, USA 4 Paediatric Department, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany

Received 8 May 2007; returned 27 June 2007; revised 6 July 2007; accepted 25 July 2007


* Corresponding author. Tel / Fax: +49-6131-17-6564; E-mail: ullmann{at}uni-mainz.de

Objectives: Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis is associated with high mortality. To assess new antifungal therapy options, animal models have to be developed to assess, in an appropriate setting, the activity of new drugs.

Methods: Male albino CD rats (125–150 g) were fed with a protein-free diet and received dexamethasone thrice weekly subcutaneously during the whole experiment. After 2 weeks, an inoculum of 106 conidia of Aspergillus fumigatus (H11-20) was injected intratracheally. Antifungal treatment was initiated and continued for a total of 7 days. Animals were grouped in numbers of 10. One group of animals served as untreated control, whereas the others were treated with amphotericin B intraperitoneally (2 and 4 mg/kg) and posaconazole via gavage (2, 4, 10 and 20 mg/kg). Survival and log10 cfu/g of the lungs were the endpoints. The strain H11-20 was tested for susceptibility in vitro to amphotericin B and posaconazole, respectively. Fungal burden of the lungs was expressed as log10 cfu/g. Survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan–Meier method. Differences in fungal burden were assessed by the Mann–Whitney test.

Results: All untreated animals died within a week. Amphotericin B and posaconazole at 2 mg/kg demonstrated survival benefits over control (P = 0.01 and P = 0.04). Dosages of 4 mg/kg were superior to 2 mg/kg for amphotericin B (P = 0.02) and posaconazole (P < 0.05), respectively. No further survival benefits were demonstrated beyond dosages of 10 mg/kg. Rats treated with 20 mg/kg posaconazole, however, had a lower fungal burden than all the other treatment groups (P = 0.0002).

Conclusions: Posaconazole and amphotericin B are effective in a dosage-dependent manner in this pulmonary aspergillosis model in immunocompromised rats.

Key Words: animal models , Aspergillus fumigatus , azoles , polyenes


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.