Skip Navigation



JAC Advance Access published online on August 17, 2007

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dkm298
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
60/4/897    most recent
dkm298v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cleijsen, R. M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Burger, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cleijsen, R. M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Burger, D. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Therapeutic drug monitoring of the HIV protease inhibitor atazanavir in clinical practice

R. M. M. Cleijsen1,2, M. E. van de Ende3, F. P. Kroon4, F. Verduyn Lunel2,5, P. P. Koopmans2,6, L. Gras7, F. de Wolf7 and D. M. Burger1,2,*

1 Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, The Netherlands 2 Nijmegen University Centre for Infectious Diseases (NUCI), Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, The Netherlands 3 Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam, The Netherlands 4 Department of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Centre, The Netherlands 5 Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, The Netherlands 6 Department of General Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, The Netherlands 7 HIV Monitoring Foundation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Received 6 May 2007; returned 6 July 2007; revised 9 July 2007; accepted 13 July 2007


* Correspondence address. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, 864 Radboud UMC Nijmegen, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Tel: +31-24-3616405; Fax: +31-24-3668755; E-mail: d.burger{at}akf.umcn.nl

Background: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is being applied for a number of antiretroviral agents. Little is known about the use of TDM for atazanavir.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort analysis on the use of TDM of atazanavir at three clinical sites in The Netherlands. Patients were divided into three groups: (i) all patients with evaluable data of plasma atazanavir concentrations and its relationship with hyperbilirubinaemia; (ii) patients who started atazanavir without documented evidence of protease inhibitor (PI) mutations; (iii) patients who started atazanavir with documented evidence of PI mutations. The genotypic inhibitory quotient (GIQ) was calculated by dividing the mean atazanavir plasma trough concentration by the number of PI mutations.

Results: A total of 108 patients were included; 70 (65.8%) were using atazanavir/ritonavir (300/100 mg once daily). No significant relationship was observed between atazanavir plasma trough concentration and antiviral response in patients starting atazanavir without PI mutations (group 2; n = 82). In contrast, a significant relationship was observed between atazanavir GIQ and treatment response in patients starting atazanavir while having PI mutations (group 3; n = 26). The cut-off value for GIQ most predictive of virological failure was 0.23 mg/L/mutation: patients (n = 8) with a GIQ equal to or below this value had 50% virological failure whereas patients (n = 18) with a GIQ above 0.23 mg/L/mutation had only 11% virological failure ({chi}2: P = 0.030). Atazanavir plasma trough concentrations were significantly related with the occurrence of increased total bilirubin concentrations.

Conclusions: TDM of atazanavir might be beneficial for patients with documented PI resistance or patients with hyperbilirubinaemia.

Key Words: pharmacokinetics , resistance , hyperbilirubinaemia


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
W. Stohr, D. Back, D. Dunn, C. Sabin, A. Winston, R. Gilson, D. Pillay, T. Hill, J. Ainsworth, B. Gazzard, et al.
Factors influencing lopinavir and atazanavir plasma concentration
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., November 6, 2009; (2009) dkp408v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Clin PharmacolHome page
M. Neely and R. Jelliffe
Practical Therapeutic Drug Management in HIV-Infected Patients: Use of Population Pharmacokinetic Models Supplemented by Individualized Bayesian Dose Optimization
J. Clin. Pharmacol., September 1, 2008; 48(9): 1081 - 1091.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
S. M. Hammer, J. J. Eron Jr, P. Reiss, R. T. Schooley, M. A. Thompson, S. Walmsley, P. Cahn, M. A. Fischl, J. M. Gatell, M. S. Hirsch, et al.
Antiretroviral Treatment of Adult HIV Infection: 2008 Recommendations of the International AIDS Society-USA Panel
JAMA, August 6, 2008; 300(5): 555 - 570.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.