JAC Advance Access published online on June 11, 2007
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dkm210
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT): is it safe for selected patients to self-administer at home? A retrospective analysis of a large cohort over 13 years
1 Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headley Way, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK 2 Bone Infection Unit, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre NHS Trust, Windmill Road, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK 3 The Pavilion, Thames Road, Goring on Thames, Reading, Berkshire RG8 9AH, UK 4 Oxfordshire Primary Care Trust, Unit 1, Isis Business Park, Pony Road, Oxford OX4 2RD, UK
Received 19 February 2007; returned 10 April 2007; revised 16 May 2007; accepted 17 May 2007
* Corresponding author. Tel: +44-1865-738029; Fax: +44-1865-227694; E-mail: p.matthews{at}doctors.org.uk
Objectives: Provision of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) is an evolving field, facilitating discharge from hospital for selected patients with serious infections. We report on a large OPAT cohort focusing on the practice of supervised parenteral antibiotic administration in the community by patients and relatives, which we collectively term self-administration. To distinguish between healthcare professional OPAT and self-administered OPAT, we have coined the terms H-OPAT and S-OPAT, respectively.
Patients and methods: We analysed data on 2059 OPAT episodes collected prospectively over a 13 year time period from 1993 to 2005.
Results: Clinical diagnosis, microbiology and antibiotics in this OPAT series are comparable to those previously reported. We identified no excess complications or hospital re-admissions in the S-OPAT group compared with the H-OPAT group.
Conclusions: Self-administration of intravenous antimicrobial therapy, in selected patients under the supervision of a specialist team, is a safe and feasible strategy.
Key Words: home intravenous therapy , H-OPAT , S-OPAT , self-administration , complications
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Nathwani Developments in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) for Gram-positive infections in Europe, and the potential impact of daptomycin J. Antimicrob. Chemother., September 1, 2009; 64(3): 447 - 453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Coenen, A. Muller, N. Adriaenssens, V. Vankerckhoven, E. Hendrickx, H. Goossens, and on behalf of the ESAC Project Group European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption (ESAC): outpatient parenteral antibiotic treatment in Europe J. Antimicrob. Chemother., July 1, 2009; 64(1): 200 - 205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Byren, P. Bejon, B. L. Atkins, B. Angus, S. Masters, P. McLardy-Smith, R. Gundle, and A. Berendt One hundred and twelve infected arthroplasties treated with 'DAIR' (debridement, antibiotics and implant retention): antibiotic duration and outcome J. Antimicrob. Chemother., June 1, 2009; 63(6): 1264 - 1271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. C Matthews, A. R Berendt, M. A McNally, and I. Byren Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection BMJ, May 29, 2009; 338(may29_1): b1773 - b1773. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. Rehm, M. Campion, D. E. Katz, R. Russo, and H. W. Boucher Community-based outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (CoPAT) for Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia with or without infective endocarditis: analysis of the randomized trial comparing daptomycin with standard therapy J. Antimicrob. Chemother., May 1, 2009; 63(5): 1034 - 1042. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. R. Ingram, Z. Sulaiman, A. Chua, and D. A. Fisher Comment on: Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT): is it safe for selected patients to self-administer at home? A retrospective analysis of a large cohort over 13 years J. Antimicrob. Chemother., January 1, 2008; 61(1): 226 - 227. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

