JAC Advance Access published online on September 19, 2006
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dkl379
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, 70 Pembroke Place, Liverpool L69 3GF, UK
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Objectives: To examine cellular and plasma concentrations of atazanavir when given in combination with saquinavir/ritonavir in HIV+ patients. Methods: Twelve HIV+ patients were receiving saquinavir/atazanavir/ritonavir 1600/200/100 mg once daily and venous blood samples were taken to determine cellular and plasma concentrations of each protease inhibitor at 2, 6, 12 and 24 h. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were separated by density gradient centrifugation. The ratio of the cellular AUC0-24/plasma AUC0-24 was calculated to determine cellular drug accumulation. Lymphocyte P-glycoprotein (P-gp), breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) and multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP1) expression was determined by flow cytometry. Nine of the patients had previously received a regimen of saquinavir/ritonavir 1600/100 mg; therefore the effect of atazanavir on the cellular and plasma pharmacokinetics of saquinavir and ritonavir was examined. Results: In vivo cellular and plasma determinations of saquinavir, atazanavir and ritonavir gave accumulation ratios of 4.9, 1.2 and 1.7, respectively. There was no relationship between saquinavir, atazanavir or ritonavir accumulation and P-gp, MRP1 or BCRP expression. When comparing pharmacokinetic values in the nine patients receiving saquinavir/ritonavir with and without atazanavir, the median cellular saquinavir AUC0-24 was significantly increased (34.9-117.2 mg·h/L) on addition of atazanavir (P = 0.004). The C24 of saquinavir in plasma and cells was significantly higher with atazanavir (plasma C24 0.05 versus 0.14 mg/L with atazanavir; cellular C24 0.61 versus 2.03 mg/L with atazanavir, P = 0.02). Conclusions: The mechanism of differential intracellular protease inhibitor accumulation is unclear. Co-administration of atazanavir caused an increase in both the plasma and cellular exposure (AUC0-24) and C24 of saquinavir but not ritonavir.
Received May 30, 2006
Revised August 18, 2006
Accepted August 18, 2006
Original article
Influence of atazanavir 200 mg on the intracellular and plasma pharmacokinetics of saquinavir and ritonavir 1600/100 mg administered once daily in HIV-infected patients
Jennifer Ford 1, Marta Boffito 2 *, Desmond Maitland 2, Andrew Hill 1, David Back 1, Saye Khoo 1, Mark Nelson 2, Graeme Moyle 2, Brian Gazzard 2, and Anton Pozniak 2
2 PK Research Ltd., St Stephen's Centre, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, 369 Fulham Road, London SW10 9NH, UK
Marta Boffito, E-mail: marta.boffito{at}chelwest.nhs.uk
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. von Hentig and J. Lotsch Cytochrome P450 3A Inhibition by Atazanavir and Ritonavir, but Not Demography or Drug Formulation, Influences Saquinavir Population Pharmacokinetics in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1-Infected Adults Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., August 1, 2009; 53(8): 3524 - 3527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Landman, C. Capitant, D. Descamps, C. Chazallon, G. Peytavin, C. Katlama, G. Pialoux, M. Bentata, F. Brun-Vezinet, J.-P. Aboulker, et al. Efficacy and safety of ritonavir-boosted dual protease inhibitor therapy in antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients: the 2IP ANRS 127 study J. Antimicrob. Chemother., July 1, 2009; 64(1): 118 - 125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

