Skip Navigation



JAC Advance Access published online on August 2, 2006

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dkl312
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
58/4/760    most recent
dkl312v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vieira, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Carmona-Ribeiro, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vieira, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Carmona-Ribeiro, A. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received March 17, 2006
Revised July 6, 2006
Accepted July 7, 2006

Original article

Cationic lipids and surfactants as antifungal agents: mode of action

Débora B. Vieira 1 and Ana M. Carmona-Ribeiro 1 *

1 Departamento de Bioquímica, Instituto de Química, Universidade de São Paulo, CP 26077, Avenida Lineu Prestes 748--Butantã, CEP 05513-970, São Paulo, Brazil

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Ana M. Carmona-Ribeiro, E-mail: mcribeir{at}iq.usp.br


   Abstract

Objectives: To determine the mechanism of antimicrobial action for cationic lipid dioctadecyldimethylammonium bromide (DODAB) and hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) against Candida albicans.

Methods: Determination of DODAB or CTAB adsorption isotherms; cell viability; cell electrophoretic mobility (EM); and leakage of small phosphorylated compounds, proteins or DNA from fungus or haemoglobin from erythrocytes.

Results: High affinity isotherms for CTAB and DODAB adsorption onto fungus cells (108 cfu/mL) yield limiting adsorption at 7.8 and 3.7 x 109 molecules per cell, respectively. Negatively charged C. albicans cells (106 cfu/mL) remain viable whereas positively charged ones die. At 0.3 mM CTAB or 0.01 mM DODAB, EM is zero and fungus viability is 50%. Cells start to die at submicellar CTAB concentrations and fungus lysis does not play a significant role in the mechanism of antifungal action. Over 0.1-10 mM CTAB or DODAB, there is no leakage of tested compounds from C. albicans cells despite the low cell viability. In contrast to the fungus, under isotonic conditions, cationic amphiphiles induce haemolysis over a range of low DODAB (>0.01 mM) and CTAB (>0.001 mM) concentrations.

Conclusions: The critical phenomenon determining antifungal effect of cationic surfactants and lipids is not cell lysis but rather the change of cell surface charge from negative to positive.

Keywords: Candida albicans; dioctadecyldimethylammonium bromide; hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide; CTAB; adsorption; cell charge; lysis; antifungal activity.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.