Skip Navigation



JAC Advance Access published online on July 19, 2006

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dkl292
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
58/3/601    most recent
dkl292v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DeRyke, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Nicolau, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DeRyke, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Nicolau, D. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received December 15, 2005
Revised June 15, 2006
Accepted June 17, 2006

Original article

Evaluation of bacterial kill when modelling the bronchopulmonary pharmacokinetic profile of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin against parC-containing isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae

C. Andrew DeRyke 1, Xiaoli Du 1, and David P. Nicolau 1 *

1 Center for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, 80 Seymour Street, P.O. Box 5037, Hartford, CT 06102, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
David P. Nicolau, E-mail: dnicola{at}harthosp.org


   Abstract

Objectives: The increasingly recognized prevalence of first-step parC mutants in Streptococcus pneumoniae and the development of de novo resistance while on fluoroquinolone therapy are of concern. Previous work by our group demonstrated the ability of moxifloxacin, but not levofloxacin, to eradicate parC mutants. The objective of this experiment was to determine whether these fluoroquinolone antibiotics provided equivalent bacterial kill when similar AUC/MICs were examined.

Methods: An in vitro pharmacodynamic model was used to simulate the epithelial lining fluid (ELF) concentrations following oral administration of levofloxacin 500 mg once daily and moxifloxacin 400 mg once daily in older adults. In addition, a range of AUC/MICs were also modelled, including levofloxacin 750 mg once daily. Five different S. pneumoniae containing first-step parC mutations and one isolate without mutations were tested for 48 h and time-kill curves were constructed. Samples at 0, 24 and 48 h were collected for phenotypic and genotypic profiling. HPLC was used to verify that target exposures were achieved.

Results: The isolate without a parC mutation displayed a 4 log reduction in cfu after treatment with levofloxacin 500 mg and did not select for resistance. In all five isolates containing first-step parC mutations, resistance emerged within 48 h with a ≥16-fold increase in MIC and the acquisition of a gyrA mutant. Increasing the exposure of levofloxacin to ~750 mg dose still led to ≥16-fold increase in MIC at 48 h in two of the four isolates containing parC mutations. On the other hand, moxifloxacin 400 mg sustained bacterial killing against the two isolates tested without the selection of resistant mutants. It appears that the critical AUC/MIC necessary to prevent the acquisition of resistance for levofloxacin is 200 and ~400 for moxifloxacin.

Conclusions: Due to suboptimal exposures, once-daily oral regimens of levofloxacin at both 500 and 750 mg inconsistently led to bactericidal activity and the frequent acquisition of a second-step gyrA mutation in S. pneumoniae isolates already containing a first-step parC mutation. Conversely, once-daily moxifloxacin 400 mg provides exposures that vastly exceed the apparent efficacy breakpoint and did not select for second-step mutants until exposures were decreased 4-fold. As a result of these data and the emerging literature involving mutations in the pneumococcus, caution should be exercised when the respiratory fluoroquinolones are used to treat patients infected with S. pneumoniae suspected of having parC mutations.

Keywords: area under the curve; fluoroquinolones; DNA topoisomerase IV; DNA gyrase; drug resistance; bacterial.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
M. Ip, S. S. L. Chau, F. Chi, E. S. C. Cheuk, H. Ma, R. W. M. Lai, and P. K. Chan
Longitudinally Tracking Fluoroquinolone Resistance and Its Determinants in Penicillin-Susceptible and -Nonsusceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolates in Hong Kong, 2000 to 2005
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., June 1, 2007; 51(6): 2192 - 2194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.