Skip Navigation



JAC Advance Access published online on May 12, 2006

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dkl197
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
58/1/85    most recent
dkl197v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Masco, L.
Right arrow Articles by Huys, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Masco, L.
Right arrow Articles by Huys, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received January 13, 2006
Revised April 4, 2006
Accepted April 24, 2006

Original article

Antimicrobial susceptibility of Bifidobacterium strains from humans, animals and probiotic products

L. Masco 1 *, K. Van Hoorde 1, E. De Brandt 1, J. Swings 2, and G. Huys 1

1 Laboratory of Microbiology, Department of Biochemistry, Physiology and Microbiology, Ghent University, K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, B-9000 Gent, Belgium
2 Laboratory of Microbiology, Department of Biochemistry, Physiology and Microbiology, Ghent University, K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, B-9000 Gent, Belgium; BCCMTM/LMG Bacteria Collection, Department of Biochemistry, Physiology and Microbiology, Ghent University, K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, B-9000 Gent, Belgium

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
L. Masco, E-mail: Liesbeth.Masco{at}UGent.be


   Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the antimicrobial susceptibility of a taxonomically diverse set of Bifidobacterium strains to different classes of antimicrobial agents using a recently described medium.

Methods: The susceptibility of 100 strains encompassing 11 bifidobacterial species originating from humans, animals and probiotic products to 12 antimicrobial agents was tested by agar overlay disc diffusion. Based on these results, one or two strains per species were selected for susceptibility testing to nine antibiotics by broth microdilution using the Lactic acid bacteria Susceptibility test Medium (LSM) supplemented with cysteine. The genotypic basis of atypical tetracycline resistance was further characterized using PCR, Southern blotting and partial sequencing.

Results: Based on the distribution of inhibition zone diameters and MIC values, all strains tested were susceptible to amoxicillin, chloramphenicol, erythromycin, quinupristin/dalfopristin, rifampicin and vancomycin. Our data also reinforce earlier observations indicating that bifidobacteria are intrinsically resistant to gentamicin, sulfamethoxazole and polymyxin B. Susceptibility to trimethoprim, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, tetracycline and minocycline was variable. The tet(W) gene was responsible for tetracycline resistance in 15 strains including 7 probiotic isolates belonging to the taxa Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis and Bifidobacterium bifidum. This gene was present in a single copy on the chromosome and did not appear to be associated with the conjugative transposon TnB1230 previously found in tet(W)-containing Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens.

Conclusions: The use of the LSM + cysteine medium allowed us to discriminate between intrinsic and atypical resistance properties of bifidobacteria and sets the scene for future definition of epidemiological cut-off values for all important Bifidobacterium species. The presence of an acquired tet(W) gene in several probiotic product isolates stresses the need for a minimal safety evaluation during the selection of Bifidobacterium strains for probiotic use.

Keywords: disc diffusion; MICs; LSM; tetracyclines; tet(W).
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
L. Rizzotti, F. La Gioia, F. Dellaglio, and S. Torriani
Characterization of Tetracycline-Resistant Streptococcus thermophilus Isolates from Italian Soft Cheeses
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., June 15, 2009; 75(12): 4224 - 4229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
J. Aires, F. Doucet-Populaire, and M. J. Butel
Tetracycline Resistance Mediated by tet(W), tet(M), and tet(O) Genes of Bifidobacterium Isolates from Humans
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., April 15, 2007; 73(8): 2751 - 2754.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
A. B. Florez, M. S. Ammor, P. Alvarez-Martin, A. Margolles, and B. Mayo
Molecular Analysis of tet(W) Gene-Mediated Tetracycline Resistance in Dominant Intestinal Bifidobacterium Species from Healthy Humans
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., November 1, 2006; 72(11): 7377 - 7379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.