JAC Advance Access published online on June 27, 2006
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dkl191
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Lluita contra la SIDA Foundation, HIV Unit, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Highly active antiretroviral therapies (HAART) provide sustained viral control in most patients, but many of these regimens are restricted by complex dosing, drug-drug interactions and toxicities. Numerous strategies of simplified treatment have been explored in order to improve patient quality of life and adherence to treatment, as well as to manage drug-related toxicities while maintaining viral suppression. The first simplification strategy involved switching from protease inhibitors (PIs) to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), with an additional benefit on lipid metabolism. The development of once-daily drugs or co-formulated combinations has successfully been used to further simplify treatment. However, studies assessing triple nucleoside regimens have shown a higher frequency of viral failure in comparison with standard HAART, mainly in patients with previous sequential suboptimal treatments. Finally, NRTI-sparing approaches, consisting of NNRTI + PI combinations or monotherapies with boosted PIs, are alternatives to avoid NRTI-related mitochondrial toxicities. An accurate analysis of each patient's history will be necessary in each case to determine whether a simplification strategy is appropriate.
Leading article
Benefits and concerns of simplification strategies in HIV-infected patients
Eugènia Negredo 1 *,
Anna Bonjoch 1,
and
Bonaventura Clotet 1
Eugènia Negredo, E-mail: enegredo{at}flsida.org
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?