Skip Navigation



JAC Advance Access published online on April 14, 2006

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dkl140
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
57/6/1128    most recent
dkl140v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sevillano, D.
Right arrow Articles by Prieto, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sevillano, D.
Right arrow Articles by Prieto, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received February 23, 2005
Revised January 24, 2006
Accepted March 22, 2006

Original article

Azithromycin iv pharmacodynamic parameters predicting Streptococcus pneumoniae killing in epithelial lining fluid versus serum: an in vitro pharmacodynamic simulation

David Sevillano 1, Luis Alou 1, Lorenzo Aguilar 1, Olatz Echevarría 1, María-José Giménez 1, and José Prieto 1 *

1 Microbiological Department, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Avda Complutense s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
José Prieto, E-mail: jprieto{at}med.ucm.es


   Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the azithromycin pharmacodynamic parameters predicting bacterial killing in epithelial lining fluid (ELF) versus serum against macrolide-susceptible and -resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates (with different resistance genotypes), through the simulation of concentrations achieved after a 500 mg intravenous (iv) once a day regimen.

Methods: An in vitro computer-controlled pharmacodynamic simulation of human azithromycin concentrations in serum and ELF was carried out, and colony counts were determined over 24 h. Four strains with MIC values (mg/L) of 0.5 [mef(A) and erm(B) negative], 2 [mef(A) positive and erm(B) negative], 8 [mef(A) positive and erm(B) negative] and 256 [mef(A) negative and erm(B) positive] were used.

Results: Significant (P < 0.05) azithromycin antibacterial activity versus antibiotic-free controls was found in serum and ELF against the susceptible and mef(A) positive strains, but not against the erm(B) positive strain. AUC0-24/MIC values around or higher than 25 were needed to achieve (time to 99.9% reduction of initial inocula of around 6 h) and maintain (24 h inocula reduction ≥3 log10cfu/mL) bactericidal activity without regrowth. This was achieved only with the susceptible strain in serum, but also with the mef(A) positive strain exhibiting an MIC of 2 mg/L in ELF.

Conclusions: The results of this study support that the suggested breakpoint for susceptibility (≤2 mg/L) may be adequate to predict S. pneumoniae eradication with ELF but not with serum concentrations obtained after a 500 mg iv once a day regimen.

Keywords: in vitro models; antipneumococcal bactericidal activity; resistance genotypes.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.