Skip Navigation



JAC Advance Access published online on February 28, 2006

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dkl052
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
57/5/992    most recent
dkl052v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Morris, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Morris, A. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received March 14, 2005
Revised December 5, 2005
Accepted February 7, 2006

Brief report

Antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria in New Zealand: 1999-2003

Sally A. Roberts 1 *, Keith P. Shore 1, Susan D. Paviour 1, David Holland 1, and Arthur J. Morris 1

1 Department of Microbiology, LabPlus, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sally A. Roberts, E-mail: sallyrob{at}adhb.govt.nz


   Abstract

Objectives: Routine susceptibility testing of all anaerobic organisms is not advocated, but it is useful for laboratories to test periodically for anaerobic organisms and provide local susceptibility data to guide therapy. This study reports the national trend of antibiotic susceptibility of clinically significant anaerobes in New Zealand.

Methods: Clinical isolates were tested using standardized methods against a range of antibiotics commonly used to treat anaerobic infections. Susceptibility was determined using NCCLS criteria. The change in susceptibility trends between this study and earlier studies was measured by comparing the geometric mean of the MIC.

Results: A total of 364 anaerobes were tested. Penicillin had poor activity against Bacteroides spp., Prevotella spp., Eubacterium spp., Clostridium tertium and Veillonella spp. In general, Fusobacterium spp., Bacteroides ureolyticus, Propionibacterium spp., Clostridium perfringens and anaerobic streptococci isolates, with the exception of Peptostreptococcus anaerobius, were penicillin susceptible. Amoxicillin/clavulanate showed good activity against most anaerobes, but resistance was seen with Bacteroides fragilis group and P. anaerobius isolates. Cefoxitin was more active than cefotetan, particularly against non-B. fragilis species, Eubacterium spp. and P. anaerobius. Meropenem and imipenem showed good activity against all anaerobes, with only 2 and 4% of Bacteroides spp., respectively, showing resistance. With the exception of Propionibacterium acnes isolates, which are predictably resistant, metronidazole was active against all anaerobes tested. There has been little change in susceptibility since 1997.

Conclusions: Metronidazole, cefoxitin, piperacillin/tazobactam and amoxicillin/clavulanate remain good empirical choices when anaerobes are expected in our setting. No clinically relevant changes in susceptibility over time were found.

Keywords: anaerobes; susceptibility patterns; susceptibility trends.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
C.-Y. Liu, Y.-T. Huang, C.-H. Liao, L.-C. Yen, H.-Y. Lin, and P.-R. Hsueh
Increasing Trends in Antimicrobial Resistance among Clinically Important Anaerobes and Bacteroides fragilis Isolates Causing Nosocomial Infections: Emerging Resistance to Carbapenems
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., September 1, 2008; 52(9): 3161 - 3168.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
M. Nisbet, S. Briggs, R. Ellis-Pegler, M. Thomas, and D. Holland
Propionibacterium acnes: an under-appreciated cause of post-neurosurgical infection
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., November 1, 2007; 60(5): 1097 - 1103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
E. Kononen, A. Bryk, P. Niemi, and A. Kanervo-Nordstrom
Antimicrobial Susceptibilities of Peptostreptococcus anaerobius and the Newly Described Peptostreptococcus stomatis Isolated from Various Human Sources
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., June 1, 2007; 51(6): 2205 - 2207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.