JAC Advance Access published online on September 8, 2005
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dki332
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Centre for Infectious Disease, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary, University of London, 4 Newark Street, London E1 2AT, UK
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Objectives: We investigated whether sulphonamide resistance in Escherichia coli remained prevalent in 2004, 9 years since the formal introduction of a UK prescribing restriction on co-trimoxazole. Resistance to other agents no longer in common use was also examined. Methods: Consecutive urinary E. coli isolates were obtained at the diagnostic microbiology laboratory of the Royal London Hospital from January to March 2004. The presence of the sulphonamide resistance genes, sul1, sul2 and sul3, and the class I integrase gene, int1, were determined by PCR. Results: Of the 391 E. coli isolates recovered in 2004, 45.5% were sulphonamide-resistant compared with 46.0% in 1999 and 39.7% in 1991. The sul2 gene remained the most prevalent sulphonamide resistance determinant, present in 81% of resistant isolates in 2004 compared with 79% and 67% in 1999 and 1991, respectively; 28% of resistant isolates carried both sul1 and sul2 genes; sul3 was not found. Resistance to streptomycin also remained common, whereas resistance to chloramphenicol and kanamycin had decreased since 1999. Conclusion: Sulphonamide resistance in E. coli persists undiminished despite the prolonged withdrawal of this antibiotic in the UK; resistance to streptomycin also seems stable whilst that to chloramphenicol and kanamycin is declining.
Received June 10, 2005
Revised August 15, 2005
Accepted August 19, 2005
Brief report
Resistance among Escherichia coli to sulphonamides and other antimicrobials now little used in man
2 Antibiotic Resistance Monitoring & Reference Laboratory, Health Protection Agency Centre for Infections, London NW9 5HT, UK
David C. Bean, E-mail: d.c.bean{at}qmul.ac.uk
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. K. Kozak, D. L. Pearl, J. Parkman, R. J. Reid-Smith, A. Deckert, and P. Boerlin Distribution of Sulfonamide Resistance Genes in Escherichia coli and Salmonella Isolates from Swine and Chickens at Abattoirs in Ontario and Quebec, Canada Appl. Envir. Microbiol., September 15, 2009; 75(18): 5999 - 6001. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Bean, D. M. Livermore, and L. M. C. Hall Plasmids Imparting Sulfonamide Resistance in Escherichia coli: Implications for Persistence Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., March 1, 2009; 53(3): 1088 - 1093. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Karpanoja, S. T. Nyberg, M. Bergman, T. Voipio, P. Paakkari, P. Huovinen, H. Sarkkinen, and and the Finnish Study Group for Antimicrobial Resi Connection between Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Use and Resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., July 1, 2008; 52(7): 2480 - 2485. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Marciano, O. Y. Karkouti, and T. Palzkill A Fitness Cost Associated With the Antibiotic Resistance Enzyme SME-1 {beta}-Lactamase Genetics, August 1, 2007; 176(4): 2381 - 2392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Frank, V. Gautier, A. Talarmin, R. Bercion, and G. Arlet Characterization of sulphonamide resistance genes and class 1 integron gene cassettes in Enterobacteriaceae, Central African Republic (CAR) J. Antimicrob. Chemother., April 1, 2007; 59(4): 742 - 745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Antunes, J. Machado, and L. Peixe Dissemination of sul3-Containing Elements Linked to Class 1 Integrons with an Unusual 3' Conserved Sequence Region among Salmonella Isolates Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., April 1, 2007; 51(4): 1545 - 1548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



