Skip Navigation



JAC Advance Access published online on May 25, 2005

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dki178
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
56/1/166    most recent
dki178v2
dki178v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Imai, J.
Right arrow Articles by Stevens, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Imai, J.
Right arrow Articles by Stevens, D. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org
Received February 7, 2005
Revised April 25, 2005
Accepted April 27, 2005

Original article

Efficacy of Abelcet and caspofungin, alone or in combination, against CNS aspergillosis in a murine model

Jackie Imai 1, Gaurav Singh 1, Belkys Fernandez 1, Karl V. Clemons 2*, and David A. Stevens 2

1 California Institute for Medical Research, San Jose, CA 95128, USA
2 California Institute for Medical Research, San Jose, CA 95128, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, CA 95128, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Karl V. Clemons, E-mail: clemons{at}cimr.org


   Abstract

Objectives: Currently, few options exist to treat central nervous system (CNS) aspergillosis, which is usually fatal. We tested the efficacy of Abelcet and caspofungin, alone and in combination for treatment of this disease.

Methods: Male CD-1 mice were immunosuppressed with 200 mg/kg cyclophosphamide 2 days prior to infection and every 5 days thereafter. In the first study, mice were infected intracerebrally with 2.1 x 106 conidia/mouse of Aspergillus fumigatus; 10 days of once daily therapy began one day later. Groups of 10 received 0.8, 4, or 8 mg/kg of Abelcet, intravenously (iv), or caspofungin, intraperitoneally, 0.8 mg/kg of conventional amphotericin B (AmB) iv, or no treatment. In a second study, mice were challenged with 6.4 x 106 conidia and given no treatment, 8 mg/kg of Abelcet or caspofungin, alone or in combination. On day 14, cfu were determined in survivors by plating of organ homogenates.

Results: In the first study, mice given any regimen of Abelcet or caspofungin had a survival rate ≥80% whereas untreated had 90% mortality. All drug regimens prolonged survival (P ≤ 0.0008) and reduced cfu (P ≤ 0.0001-0.003) recovered from the brains and kidneys compared with untreated. Abelcet showed an apparent dose-related reduction of cfu in the brains. Abelcet at 4 or 8 mg/kg were equivalent to AmB in reducing cfu from both organs (P > 0.05); AmB was superior to 0.8 mg/kg of Abelcet in the brain only (P < 0.02). Abelcet at 8 mg/kg or AmB at 0.8 mg/kg were superior to all regimens of caspofungin in reducing cfu (P ≤ 0.05-0.001). In the second study, Abelcet alone significantly prolonged survival and reduced cfu in the organs versus the controls. Caspofungin did not significantly prolong survival or reduce cfu in comparison with the controls. In combination, Abelcet and caspofungin were equivalent to Abelcet alone.

Conclusions: Abelcet proved to be efficacious, but not curative, in the treatment of CNS aspergillosis and was equivalent overall to conventional AmB. Caspofungin was not as effective against the larger inoculum, but did not enhance or interfere with the efficacy of Abelcet. Since Abelcet displayed dose-responsive efficacy, it is possible higher doses could produce superior results, yet not show toxicity.

Keywords: Aspergillus fumigatus; antifungal combination therapy; echinocandins.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
E. Spreghini, F. Orlando, A. Santinelli, E. Pisa, C. Loretelli, E. Manso, M. E. Milici, G. Scalise, and F. Barchiesi
Anidulafungin in Combination with Amphotericin B against Aspergillus fumigatus
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., September 1, 2009; 53(9): 4035 - 4039.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
J. C. Bowman, G. K. Abruzzo, A. M. Flattery, C. J. Gill, E. J. Hickey, M. J. Hsu, J. Nielsen Kahn, P. A. Liberator, A. S. Misura, B. A. Pelak, et al.
Efficacy of Caspofungin against Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus terreus, and Aspergillus nidulans
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., December 1, 2006; 50(12): 4202 - 4205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
K. V. Clemons, R. Parmar, M. Martinez, and D. A. Stevens
Efficacy of Abelcet alone, or in combination therapy, against experimental central nervous system aspergillosis
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., August 1, 2006; 58(2): 466 - 469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
W. van Vianen, S. de Marie, M. T. ten Kate, R. A. A. Mathot, and I. A. J. M. Bakker-Woudenberg
Caspofungin: antifungal activity in vitro, pharmacokinetics, and effects on fungal load and animal survival in neutropenic rats with invasive pulmonary aspergillosis
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., April 1, 2006; 57(4): 732 - 740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.