Skip Navigation



JAC Advance Access published online on May 12, 2005
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dki152
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
56/1/204    most recent
dki152v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mayon-White, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by Wiffen, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mayon-White, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by Wiffen, P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org
Received February 9, 2005
Revised April 5, 2004
Accepted April 13, 2005

Brief report

Audit of antibiotic policies in the South East of England, 2004

R. T. Mayon-White 1* and P. Wiffen 2

1 Department of Primary Care, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK
2 UK Cochrane Centre, Middle Way, Oxford OX2 7LG, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
R. T. Mayon-White, E-mail: richard.mayon-white{at}dphpc.ox.ac.uk


  Abstract

Objectives: The antibiotic policies of hospitals and primary care trusts (PCTs) in South East England were audited in the summer of 2004, to see how they had improved since 2000.

Methods: Antibiotic policies were obtained from pharmacists in NHS hospitals and PCTs, and examined for dates, formats, evidence base for policies, the type of guidance given on dosage, length of treatment, choice of antibiotics, coverage of common infections and reasons for prophylaxis.

Results: Twenty-three hospital and 25 primary care policies were examined. The average age of policies was 12 months, but 13 were more than 2 years old. The commonest format was an A4-sized document available in an electronic version. Primary care policies were more uniform than hospital policies. More primary care than hospitals' policies gave evidence to support their guidance. Ten policies used plain English for dosages, and 38 (79%) policies made few or no cautionary points about the drugs recommended. Respiratory and urinary infections were covered in most policies, but guidance on gastroenteritis and antibiotic prophylaxis was less frequent. There was little advice in the policies on the management of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Conclusions: Primary care policies have improved since 2000, using a national model for evidence and a consistent style. Hospitals could benefit from similar national guidance, especially in the evidence to support the contents of antibiotic policies.

Keywords: antibiotic policies; audit; antibiotics.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
S. P. Stone, B. S. Cooper, C. C. Kibbler, B. D. Cookson, J. A. Roberts, G. F. Medley, G. Duckworth, R. Lai, S. Ebrahim, E. M. Brown, et al.
The ORION statement: guidelines for transparent reporting of Outbreak Reports and Intervention studies Of Nosocomial infection
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., May 1, 2007; 59(5): 833 - 840.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
C. W. E. Drummond
Resistance is futile--a conference to promote the rational use of antimicrobials in acute hospitals
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., February 1, 2006; 57(2): 171 - 175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.