Skip Navigation



JAC Advance Access published online on April 22, 2005
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dki119
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
55/6/821    most recent
dki119v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maggiolo, F.
Right arrow Articles by Suter, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maggiolo, F.
Right arrow Articles by Suter, F.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Leading article

Switch strategies in patients on effective HAART

Franco Maggiolo 1*, Diego Ripamonti 1, and Fredy Suter 1

1 Division of Infectious Diseases, Ospedali Riuniti, Largo Barozzi 1, Bergamo 24128, Italy

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Franco Maggiolo, E-mail: franco31556{at}hotmail.com


  Abstract

To provide the best possible long-term outcomes for patients, a number of strategies have been proposed based on the possibility to switch from a successful protease inhibitor (PI)-based highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) to another antiretroviral regimen. The available evidence from clinical trials in virologically controlled patients demonstrates that switching the PI-based HAART to a simplified regimen is safe. However, abacavir-based simplified therapies should be limited to patients with a known drug history who have not undergone prior mono or dual nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) therapy. Triple NRTI regimens that do not include a thymidine analogue have not been adequately tested so far and are not recommended. The switch strategy may enhance long-term adherence and induce a moderate reduction in cholesterol or amelioration of the total/high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol ratio that might be particularly relevant for patients presenting other risks for coronary heart disease. Simplified regimens are not associated with a clinically relevant improvement in the redistribution of body fat. Thus, if such a therapeutic strategy is considered, it should be preferably implemented to prevent or delay lipodystrophy. As the therapeutic scenario is significantly changing, in the future, convenience and metabolic alterations will be less of an issue in the decision to use a PI-switch strategy. Future switch strategies may involve NRTIs. Among NRTIs, thymidine analogues and particularly stavudine appear to be most associated with lipoatrophy. NRTI switches may also be beneficial in reducing the risk of lactate level elevation, mitochondrial toxicity, insufficient immunological response to HAART and of selecting class-inducing resistance mutations.

Keywords: HIV; HAART simplification; protease inhibitors; NRTIs; NNRTIs; switch therapy.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.