Skip Navigation



JAC Advance Access published online on April 6, 2005

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dki093
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
55/5/805    most recent
dki093v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Filius, P. M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Verbrugh, H. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Filius, P. M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Verbrugh, H. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org
Received July 13, 2004
Revised December 20, 2004
Accepted February 8, 2005

Brief report

An additional measure for quantifying antibiotic use in hospitals

P. M. G. Filius 1*, T. B. Y. Liem 2, P. D. van der Linden 3, R. Janknegt 4, S. Natsch 5, A. G. Vulto 2, and H. A. Verbrugh 1

1 Departments of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
2 Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
3 Department of Pharmacy, Apotheek Haagse Ziekenhuizen, The Hague, The Netherlands
4 Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Maasland Ziekenhuis, Sittard, The Netherlands
5 Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Center Nijmegen and Nijmegen University Center for Infectious Diseases, The Netherlands

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
P. M. G. Filius, E-mail: p.filius{at}erasmusmc.nl


   Abstract

Objectives: The number of defined daily doses (DDD) per 100 patient days is often used as an indicator for the selection pressure exerted by antibiotics in the hospital setting. However, this unit of measurement does not fully describe the selection pressure and is sensitive to changes in hospital resource indicators. Additional information is required to facilitate interpretation of this indicator. The number of DDD per 100 admissions could be a valuable additional tool. The aim of this study is to investigate the importance of units of measurement in quantifying antibiotic use data with regards to antibiotic resistance risks.

Patients and methods: Trends in antibiotic use in acute care Dutch hospitals between 1997-2001 were studied. Antibiotic use was expressed in DDD per 100 patient days and in DDD per 100 admissions.

Results: From 1997 to 2001, total systemic antibiotic use significantly increased from 47.2 to 54.7 DDD per 100 patient days, whereas expressed in DDD per 100 admissions it remained constant. Some individual antibiotics increases in DDD per 100 patient days were not accompanied by increases in DDD per 100 admissions and vice versa. The mean number of total DDD per hospital decreased (not significantly) between 1997 and 2001. The mean number of patient days, admissions and length of stay decreased significantly.

Conclusions: Knowledge of variation in resource indicators and additional expression of the data in DDD per 100 admissions is imperative for a meaningful understanding of observed trends in antibiotic use expressed in DDD per 100 patient days. Further research is needed to determine the correlation between different measures of antibiotic use and the level of antibiotic resistance.

Keywords: antibiotic usage; defined daily doses; selection density; selection pressure.

{dagger}P. M. G. Filius and T. B. Y. Liem contributed equally to this work and share first authorship.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
H. S. M. Ammerlaan, A. Troelstra, C. L. J. J. Kruitwagen, J. A. J. W. Kluytmans, and M. J. M. Bonten
Quantifying changes in incidences of nosocomial bacteraemia caused by antibiotic-susceptible and antibiotic-resistant pathogens
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., May 1, 2009; 63(5): 1064 - 1070.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Trop PediatrHome page
H. Ding, Y. Yang, Q. Lu, Y. Wang, Y. Chen, L. Deng, A. Wang, Q. Deng, H. Zhang, C. Wang, et al.
Five-year Surveillance of Antimicrobial use in Chinese Pediatric Intensive Care Units
J Trop Pediatr, August 1, 2008; 54(4): 238 - 242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
L.-X. Zhu, Z.-W. Zhang, D. Liang, D. Jiang, C. Wang, N. Du, Q. Zhang, K. Mitchelson, and J. Cheng
Multiplex Asymmetric PCR-Based Oligonucleotide Microarray for Detection of Drug Resistance Genes Containing Single Mutations in Enterobacteriaceae
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., October 1, 2007; 51(10): 3707 - 3713.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
I. Willemsen, A. Groenhuijzen, D. Bogaers, A. Stuurman, P. van Keulen, and J. Kluytmans
Appropriateness of Antimicrobial Therapy Measured by Repeated Prevalence Surveys
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., March 1, 2007; 51(3): 864 - 867.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
A. Berrington
Hospital antibiotic prescribing data require careful local interpretation
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., January 1, 2007; 59(1): 162 - 163.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
R. H. Vander Stichele, M. M. Elseviers, M. Ferech, S. Blot, H. Goossens, and on behalf of the European Surveillance of Antibiot
Hospital consumption of antibiotics in 15 European countries: results of the ESAC Retrospective Data Collection (1997-2002)
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., July 1, 2006; 58(1): 159 - 167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.