JAC Advance Access published online on February 18, 2005
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dki017
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Servicio de Microbiologia, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Juan Canalejo, As Xubias 84, 15006 La Coruña, Spain
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Objectives: To evaluate the performance of oxacillin, cefazolin, cefoxitin, cefotaxime and imipenem discs; Etest for oxacillin; microdilution; agar screening plates with 2 and 6 mg/L of oxacillin; and PBP2' agglutination for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Methods: A total of 102 clinical S. aureus isolates, including 51 MRSA isolates, tested by PCR for the presence or absence of the mecA gene (gold standard method), isolated from different patients and at different times, were tested with: oxacillin (1 µg), cefazolin, cefoxitin, cefotaxime and imipenem (all 30 µg) discs; Etest for oxacillin; microdilution with oxacillin; agar screening tests (ORSAB medium) with 2 mg/L or 6 mg/L of oxacillin; and PBP2' agglutination with two different kits for detection of MRSA strains. Results: The cefoxitin disc, ORSAB medium and PBP2' detection all showed 100% sensitivity. The cefoxitin, cefazolin and imipenem discs, Etest for oxacillin, microdilution and agar screening method with 6 mg/L at 24 h showed the highest specificity (100%), although variable degrees of sensitivity. The cefoxitin disc, which showed negative and positive predictive values of 100% and 98%, respectively was the best method for detecting MRSA isolates. Conclusions: In the absence of availability of molecular biology techniques, the cefoxitin disc was the best predictor of methicillin resistance in S. aureus from among the techniques tested.
Received October 26, 2004
Revised December 7, 2004
Accepted December 8, 2004
Brief report
Evaluation of different methods for detecting methicillin (oxacillin) resistance in Staphylococcus aureus
2 Unidad de Investigacion, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Juan Canalejo, As Xubias 84, 15006 La Coruña, Spain
3 Servicio de Microbiologia, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Juan Canalejo, As Xubias 84, 15006 La Coruña, Spain; Unidad de Investigacion, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Juan Canalejo, As Xubias 84, 15006 La Coruña, Spain
German Bou, E-mail: germanbou{at}canalejo.org
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. D. Junkins, S. R. Lockhart, K. P. Heilmann, C. L. Dohrn, D. L. Von Stein, P. L. Winokur, G. V. Doern, and S. S. Richter BD Phoenix and Vitek 2 Detection of mecA-Mediated Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus with Cefoxitin J. Clin. Microbiol., September 1, 2009; 47(9): 2879 - 2882. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Khalid, Z. Zakaria, O. P. Toung, and S. McOrist Low levels of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pigs in Malaysia Vet Rec., May 16, 2009; 164(20): 626 - 626. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. M. Broekema, T. T. Van, T. A. Monson, S. A. Marshall, and D. M. Warshauer Comparison of Cefoxitin and Oxacillin Disk Diffusion Methods for Detection of mecA-Mediated Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus in a Large-Scale Study J. Clin. Microbiol., January 1, 2009; 47(1): 217 - 219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Torres, S. Perez, R. Villanueva, and G. Bou Evaluation of the Vitek 2 AST-P559 Card for Detection of Oxacillin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus J. Clin. Microbiol., December 1, 2008; 46(12): 4114 - 4115. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. R. R. Perez, C. Dias, and P. A. d'Azevedo Agar dilution and agar screen with cefoxitin and oxacillin: what is known and what is unknown in detection of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus J. Med. Microbiol., August 1, 2008; 57(8): 954 - 956. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Jain, A. Agarwal, and R. K. Verma Cefoxitin disc diffusion test for detection of meticillin-resistant staphylococci J. Med. Microbiol., August 1, 2008; 57(8): 957 - 961. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Malhotra-Kumar, K. Haccuria, M. Michiels, M. Ieven, C. Poyart, W. Hryniewicz, H. Goossens, and on behalf of the MOSAR WP2 Study Team Current Trends in Rapid Diagnostics for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Glycopeptide-Resistant Enterococcus Species J. Clin. Microbiol., May 1, 2008; 46(5): 1577 - 1587. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. R. S. Lagace-Wiens, M. J. Alfa, K. Manickam, and G. K. M. Harding Reductions in Workload and Reporting Time by Use of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Screening with MRSASelect Medium Compared to Mannitol-Salt Medium Supplemented with Oxacillin J. Clin. Microbiol., April 1, 2008; 46(4): 1174 - 1177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Skov, R. Smyth, A. R. Larsen, A. Bolmstrom, A. Karlsson, K. Mills, N. Frimodt-Moller, and G. Kahlmeter Phenotypic Detection of Methicillin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus by Disk Diffusion Testing and Etest on Mueller-Hinton Agar J. Clin. Microbiol., December 1, 2006; 44(12): 4395 - 4399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Fang and G. Hedin Use of Cefoxitin-Based Selective Broth for Improved Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus J. Clin. Microbiol., February 1, 2006; 44(2): 592 - 594. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


