Skip Navigation



JAC Advance Access published online on December 1, 2004

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dkh495
© 2004 by The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
55/1/38    most recent
dkh495v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moubareck, C.
Right arrow Articles by Doucet-Populaire, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moubareck, C.
Right arrow Articles by Doucet-Populaire, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Received May 27, 2004
Revised September 10, 2004
Accepted October 1, 2004

Original article

Antimicrobial susceptibility of bifidobacteria

C. Moubareck 1, F. Gavini 2, L. Vaugien 3, M. J. Butel 1, and F. Doucet-Populaire 4*

1 Laboratoire de Microbiologie, UFR des Sciences Pharmaceutiques et Biologiques, Université René Descartes, 75270 Paris Cedex 06, France
2 INRA, Villeneuve d'Ascq, Virologie et Microbiologie Industrielle, UFR des Sciences Pharmaceutiques, Université Paul Sabatier, 31062 Toulouse cedex 4 France
3 EA3036 Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Virologie et Microbiologie Industrielle, UFR des Sciences Pharmaceutiques, Université Paul Sabatier, 31062 Toulouse cedex 4, France
4 Laboratoire de Microbiologie, UFR des Sciences Pharmaceutiques et Biologiques, Université René Descartes, 75270 Paris Cedex 06, France; Centre Hospitalier de Versailles, Le Chesnay, France

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
F. Doucet-Populaire, E-mail: florence.doucet-populaire{at}univ-paris5.fr


   Abstract

Objectives: The aim of our study was to analyse the antibiotic susceptibility of various strains of Bifidobacterium spp. to a wide range of antimicrobial agents.

Methods: Fifty strains belonging to eight species of bifidobacteria, isolated from humans, animals or probiotic products, were tested for susceptibility to 30 antibiotics by disc diffusion on Brucella agar supplemented with 5% laked sheep blood and vitamin K1 (1 mg/L). MICs of nine anti-anaerobe agents, including three new molecules (telithromycin, linezolid and gatifloxacin), were determined using the reference agar-dilution method.

Results: All strains of bifidobacteria, whatever the species, were sensitive to penicillins: penicillin G, amoxicillin (MIC50 0.06 mg/L), piperacillin, ticarcillin, imipenem and usually anti-Gram-positive antibiotics (macrolides, clindamycin, pristinamycin, vancomycin and teicoplanin). Susceptibility to cefalothin and cefotetan was variable. Most isolates (70%) were resistant to fusidic acid. As expected, high resistance rates were observed for aminoglycosides. Metronidazole, an agent known for its anti-anaerobe activity, was ineffective against 38% of the strains. The newly commercialized molecules, telithromycin,  linezolid and gatifloxacin, were active with MIC50S of 1 mg/L. The only variation in susceptibility observed among the different species concerned Bifidobacterium breve, which appeared to be generally more resistant. Potentially acquired resistance was only observed against tetracycline and minocycline, in 14% of the strains.

Conclusions: With regard to a general concern about the safety of probiotics, such as potential transferability of resistance determinants, bifidobacteria, with their low natural and acquired resistance to 30 antibiotics, appear risk-free.

Keywords: MICs; probiotics; anaerobes; tetracyclines; linezolid.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in J. Antimicrob. Chemother.:

Antimicrobial susceptibility of bifidobacteria
C. Moubareck, F. Gavini, L. Vaugien, M. J. Butel, and F. Doucet-Populaire
J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2005 10.1093/jac/dki162. [Abstract]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
S. D. Mahlen and J. E. Clarridge III
Site and Clinical Significance of Alloscardovia omnicolens and Bifidobacterium Species Isolated in the Clinical Laboratory
J. Clin. Microbiol., October 1, 2009; 47(10): 3289 - 3293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
N. Vasquez, A. Suau, F. Magne, P. Pochart, and M.-A. Pelissier
Differential Effects of Bifidobacterium pseudolongum Strain Patronus and Metronidazole in the Rat Gut
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., January 15, 2009; 75(2): 381 - 386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
J. Aires, F. Doucet-Populaire, and M. J. Butel
Tetracycline Resistance Mediated by tet(W), tet(M), and tet(O) Genes of Bifidobacterium Isolates from Humans
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., April 15, 2007; 73(8): 2751 - 2754.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
C. Moubareck, M. Lecso, E. Pinloche, M. J. Butel, and F. Doucet-Populaire
Inhibitory Impact of Bifidobacteria on the Transfer of {beta}-Lactam Resistance among Enterobacteriaceae in the Gnotobiotic Mouse Digestive Tract
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., February 1, 2007; 73(3): 855 - 860.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MicrobiologyHome page
A. Margolles, A. B. Florez, J. A. Moreno, D. van Sinderen, and C. G. de los Reyes-Gavilan
Two membrane proteins from Bifidobacterium breve UCC2003 constitute an ABC-type multidrug transporter
Microbiology, December 1, 2006; 152(12): 3497 - 3505.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
A. B. Florez, M. S. Ammor, P. Alvarez-Martin, A. Margolles, and B. Mayo
Molecular Analysis of tet(W) Gene-Mediated Tetracycline Resistance in Dominant Intestinal Bifidobacterium Species from Healthy Humans
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., November 1, 2006; 72(11): 7377 - 7379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
R. Mohan, C. Koebnick, J. Schildt, S. Schmidt, M. Mueller, M. Possner, M. Radke, and M. Blaut
Effects of Bifidobacterium lactis Bb12 Supplementation on Intestinal Microbiota of Preterm Infants: a Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Study
J. Clin. Microbiol., November 1, 2006; 44(11): 4025 - 4031.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
L. Masco, K. Van Hoorde, E. De Brandt, J. Swings, and G. Huys
Antimicrobial susceptibility of Bifidobacterium strains from humans, animals and probiotic products
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., July 1, 2006; 58(1): 85 - 94.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
A. Margolles, J. A. Moreno, D. van Sinderen, and C. G. de los Reyes-Gavilan
Macrolide Resistance Mediated by a Bifidobacterium breve Membrane Protein
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., October 1, 2005; 49(10): 4379 - 4381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.