JAC Advance Access published online on September 3, 2004
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dkh423
© 2004 by The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Division of Infectious Diseases, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: vmeka{at}bidmc.harvard.edu.
Objectives: Linezolid resistance in rare isolates of Staphylococcus aureus has been associated with G2576T mutations in domain V of the 23S rRNA gene. We report the analysis of a clinical S. aureus isolate that developed linezolid resistance (MIC of linezolid of 12 mg/L) after a 25 day course of the drug. Sequencing identified G2576T mutations in four of the five copies of the 23S rRNA gene. Methods: To examine the stability of this resistance, we serially passaged this original isolate 60 times over a 75 day period on antimicrobial-free medium. Results: After 30 passages, the MIC of linezolid had decreased to 8 mg/L and only two of the five copies of the 23S rRNA gene contained the G2576T mutation. After 60 passages, the MIC of linezolid fell to 2 mg/L and only one of the five 23S rRNA gene copies contained the mutation. The original and two passaged staphylococci were indistinguishable by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Conclusions: In the absence of antibiotic pressure, linezolid resistance was unstable in a clinical isolate that did not have all copies of the 23S rRNA gene mutated, although a single copy of mutant rDNA was maintained. Gene conversion was probably the mechanism for this reversion, using the wild-type 23S rRNA gene sequences to replace the G2576T mutation by homologous recombination.
Revised August 9, 2004
Accepted August 10, 2004
Brief report
Reversion to susceptibility in a linezolid-resistant clinical isolate of Staphylococcus aureus
2 Department of Pharmacy, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA
3 Division of Infectious Diseases, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA USA
4 Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
5 Division of Microbiology and Immunology, Department of Pathology, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. M. Livermore, S. Mushtaq, M. Warner, and N. Woodford Activity of oxazolidinone TR-700 against linezolid-susceptible and -resistant staphylococci and enterococci J. Antimicrob. Chemother., April 1, 2009; 63(4): 713 - 715. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Miller, A. J. O'Neill, M. H. Wilcox, E. Ingham, and I. Chopra Delayed Development of Linezolid Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus following Exposure to Low Levels of Antimicrobial Agents Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., June 1, 2008; 52(6): 1940 - 1944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Besier, A. Ludwig, J. Zander, V. Brade, and T. A. Wichelhaus Linezolid Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: Gene Dosage Effect, Stability, Fitness Costs, and Cross-Resistances Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., April 1, 2008; 52(4): 1570 - 1572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Tsakris, S. K. Pillai, H. S. Gold, C. Thauvin-Eliopoulos, L. Venkataraman, C. Wennersten, R. C. Moellering Jr, and G. M. Eliopoulos Persistence of rRNA operon mutated copies and rapid re-emergence of linezolid resistance in Staphylococcus aureus J. Antimicrob. Chemother., September 1, 2007; 60(3): 649 - 651. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Seedat, G. Zick, I. Klare, C. Konstabel, N. Weiler, and H. Sahly Rapid Emergence of Resistance to Linezolid during Linezolid Therapy of an Enterococcus faecium Infection Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., December 1, 2006; 50(12): 4217 - 4219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. N. Jones, J. E. Ross, T. R. Fritsche, and H. S. Sader Oxazolidinone susceptibility patterns in 2004: report from the Zyvox(R) Annual Appraisal of Potency and Spectrum (ZAAPS) Program assessing isolates from 16 nations J. Antimicrob. Chemother., February 1, 2006; 57(2): 279 - 287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Wolter, A. M. Smith, D. J. Farrell, and K. P. Klugman Heterogeneous Macrolide Resistance and Gene Conversion in the Pneumococcus Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., January 1, 2006; 50(1): 359 - 361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Draghi, D. J. Sheehan, P. Hogan, and D. F. Sahm In Vitro Activity of Linezolid against Key Gram-Positive Organisms Isolated in the United States: Results of the LEADER 2004 Surveillance Program Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., December 1, 2005; 49(12): 5024 - 5032. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Bogdanovich, L. M. Ednie, S. Shapiro, and P. C. Appelbaum Antistaphylococcal Activity of Ceftobiprole, a New Broad-Spectrum Cephalosporin Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., October 1, 2005; 49(10): 4210 - 4219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

