JAC Advance Access published online on May 18, 2004
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dkh274
© 2004 by The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Institut für Infektionsmedizin, Zentrum für Klinisch-Theoretische Medizin I, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: e.stuerenburg{at}uke.uni-hamburg.de.
Objectives: In this study, we evaluated the performance of a new ESBL Etest configuration based on clavulanate synergy with cefepime compared with cefotaxime-clavulanate and ceftazidime-clavulanate ESBL Etest strips for the detection of extended-spectrum Methods: Overall, a total of 54 clinical isolates of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae species were evaluated: Enterobacter aerogenes (n=3), Enterobacter cloacae (n=10), Escherichia coli (n=10), Klebsiella oxytoca (n=3), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=25) and Proteus mirabilis (n=3). To check Etest behaviour with resistance phenotypes similar to ESBL, our panel was expanded by six clinical isolates of K. oxytoca that were identified as putative producers of their chromosomal K1 Results: With this panel, ESBL Etest was 98% sensitive with cefepime-clavulanate, 83% with cefotaxime-clavulanate, and 74% with ceftazidime-clavulanate strips. Concentrating on Enterobacter spp., reliable ESBL detection could only be achieved by the new cefepime-clavulanate strip since it confirmed ESBL production in all strains (100% sensitivity) whereas only 4/13 (31%) of Enterobacter strains were positive using cefotaxime-clavulanate or ceftazidime-clavulanate strips. A limitation of using the new cefepime strip was less than optimal specificity with K1 phenotypes of K. oxytoca: among six strains, four isolates were scored false-positive by Etest strips containing cefepime-clavulanate. Conclusion: The new Etest ESBL strip containing cefepime-clavulanate is a valuable supplement to current methods for detection of ESBLs. In our study collection, the cefepime-clavulanate strip was the best configuration for detection of ESBLs, particularly in Enterobacter spp.
Revised April 13, 2004
Accepted April 14, 2004
Original article
Evaluation of a new cefepime-clavulanate ESBL Etest to detect extended-spectrum
-lactamases in an Enterobacteriaceae strain collection
![]()
Abstract
-lactamases (ESBL) in an Enterobacteriaceae strain collection, with special focus on Enterobacter spp.
-lactamase.![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Farber, K.-A. Moder, F. Layer, I. Tammer, W. Konig, and B. Konig Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase Detection with Different Panels for Automated Susceptibility Testing and with a Chromogenic Medium J. Clin. Microbiol., November 1, 2008; 46(11): 3721 - 3727. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Apfalter, O. Assadian, F. Daxbock, A. M. Hirschl, M. L. Rotter, and A. Makristathis Extended double disc synergy testing reveals a low prevalence of extended-spectrum {beta}-lactamases in Enterobacter spp. in Vienna, Austria J. Antimicrob. Chemother., May 1, 2007; 59(5): 854 - 859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Wiegand, H. K. Geiss, D. Mack, E. Sturenburg, and H. Seifert Detection of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamases among Enterobacteriaceae by Use of Semiautomated Microbiology Systems and Manual Detection Procedures J. Clin. Microbiol., April 1, 2007; 45(4): 1167 - 1174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Spanu, M. Sanguinetti, M. Tumbarello, T. D'Inzeo, B. Fiori, B. Posteraro, R. Santangelo, R. Cauda, and G. Fadda Evaluation of the New VITEK 2 Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL) Test for Rapid Detection of ESBL Production in Enterobacteriaceae Isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol., September 1, 2006; 44(9): 3257 - 3262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Rossi, F. Baquero, P.-R. Hsueh, D. L. Paterson, G. V. Bochicchio, T. A. Snyder, V. Satishchandran, K. McCarroll, M. J. DiNubile, and J. W. Chow In vitro susceptibilities of aerobic and facultatively anaerobic Gram-negative bacilli isolated from patients with intra-abdominal infections worldwide: 2004 results from SMART (Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends) J. Antimicrob. Chemother., July 1, 2006; 58(1): 205 - 210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Schwaber, S. Navon-Venezia, I. Chmelnitsky, A. Leavitt, D. Schwartz, and Y. Carmeli Utility of the VITEK 2 Advanced Expert System for Identification of Extended-Spectrum {beta}-Lactamase Production in Enterobacter spp. J. Clin. Microbiol., January 1, 2006; 44(1): 241 - 243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Burgess and C. R. Frei Comparison of {beta}-lactam regimens for the treatment of Gram-negative pulmonary infections in the intensive care unit based on pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics J. Antimicrob. Chemother., November 1, 2005; 56(5): 893 - 898. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. G. Winstanley, H. K. Parsons, M. A. Horstkotte, I. Sobottka, and E. Sturenburg Phenotypic detection of {beta}-lactamase-mediated resistance to oxyimino-cephalosporins in Enterobacteriaceae: evaluation of the Mastascan Elite Expert System J. Antimicrob. Chemother., August 1, 2005; 56(2): 292 - 296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Paterson, F. Rossi, F. Baquero, P.-R. Hsueh, G. L. Woods, V. Satishchandran, T. A. Snyder, C. M. Harvey, H. Teppler, M. J. DiNubile, et al. In vitro susceptibilities of aerobic and facultative Gram-negative bacilli isolated from patients with intra-abdominal infections worldwide: the 2003 Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART) J. Antimicrob. Chemother., June 1, 2005; 55(6): 965 - 973. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Sturenburg, M. Lang, M. A. Horstkotte, R. Laufs, and D. Mack Evaluation of the MicroScan ESBL plus confirmation panel for detection of extended-spectrum {beta}-lactamases in clinical isolates of oxyimino-cephalosporin-resistant Gram-negative bacteria J. Antimicrob. Chemother., November 1, 2004; 54(5): 870 - 875. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

