Skip Navigation



JAC Advance Access published online on May 5, 2004

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dkh232
© 2004 by The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
53/6/1018    most recent
dkh232v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Received March 6, 2004
Accepted March 9, 2004

Original article

Antimicrobial susceptibility of the pathogens of bacteraemia in the UK and Ireland 2001-2002: the BSAC Bacteraemia Resistance Surveillance Programme

Rosy Reynolds 1, Nicola Potz 2, Melissa Colman 2, Andrea Williams 2, David Livermore 2, Alasdair MacGowan 1, on behalf of the BSAC Extended Working Party on Bacteraemia Resistance Surveillance

1 Department of Medical Microbiology, Southmead Hospital, Bristol BS10 5NB;
2 Antibiotic Resistance Monitoring & Reference Laboratory, Health Protection Agency, 61 Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5HT, UK


   Abstract

Objectives: To describe the current patterns of antimicrobial resistance in the major pathogens of bacteraemia in the UK and Ireland, to highlight any unexpected resistance patterns and to act as a reference baseline for future studies.

Methods: In 2001 and 2002, 5092 blood culture isolates were collected by 29 laboratories distributed across the UK and Ireland. A single central laboratory re-identified the isolates and measured MICs by the BSAC agar dilution method.

Results: Oxacillin resistance was found in 42% of Staphylococcus aureus and 76% of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Streptococci were generally susceptible to {beta}-lactams, but tetracycline resistance was common (except in Streptococcus pneumoniae) and particularly common among group B isolates (82% resistant). Nine percent of S. pneumoniae had reduced susceptibility to penicillin (MICs 0.12-1 mg/L), but none required >=2 mg/L for inhibition. High-level gentamicin resistance was seen in 43% of Enterococcus faecalis, often in combination with raised ciprofloxacin MICs (>=32 mg/L), but these isolates remained susceptible to ampicillin and imipenem. Only linezolid and tigecycline showed in vitro potency against a large proportion of Enterococcus faecium. Vancomycin resistance was restricted to enterococci (20% of E. faecium, 3% of E. faecalis) and a single isolate of coagulase-negative staphylococci (0.2%, MIC of 8 mg/L). Escherichia coli isolates were commonly resistant to amoxicillin (56%) and tetracycline (88%) but remained susceptible to ceftazidime, piperacillin/tazobactam and imipenem. Extended-spectrum {beta}-lactamases were detected in 2% of E. coli (none in 2001, 3.2% in 2002), 5% of Klebsiella spp. and 8% of Enterobacter spp. Resistance rates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime, gentamicin, imipenem and piperacillin/tazobactam were between 4% and 7%. Among the newly licensed and developmental agents, there was no resistance to linezolid in Gram-positive organisms. Ertapenem had a wide spectrum, covering Enterobacteriaceae, streptococci and oxacillin-susceptible staphylococci. MICs of tigecycline were low for Gram-positive species and Enterobacteriaceae except Proteeae and Enterobacter spp.

Conclusion: Antimicrobial resistance among major bloodstream pathogens to those antimicrobials often selected for empirical therapy was relatively uncommon in 2001-2002, usually <10%. An important exception was oxacillin resistance in S. aureus.

Key Words: Keywords: bloodstream infections, resistance epidemiology, British Isles, antibacterials


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
T. Kelesidis, D. E. Karageorgopoulos, I. Kelesidis, and M. E. Falagas
Tigecycline for the treatment of multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: a systematic review of the evidence from microbiological and clinical studies
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., August 1, 2008; (2008) dkn311v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
F. Perez, A. M. Hujer, K. M. Hujer, B. K. Decker, P. N. Rather, and R. A. Bonomo
Global Challenge of Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., October 1, 2007; 51(10): 3471 - 3484.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
P. Moreillon, W. R. Wilson, R. Leclercq, and J. M. Entenza
Single-Dose Oral Amoxicillin or Linezolid for Prophylaxis of Experimental Endocarditis Due to Vancomycin-Susceptible and Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecalis
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., May 1, 2007; 51(5): 1661 - 1665.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
D. M. Livermore, M. Warner, S. Mushtaq, S. North, and N. Woodford
In Vitro Activity of the Oxazolidinone RWJ-416457 against Linezolid-Resistant and -Susceptible Staphylococci and Enterococci
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., March 1, 2007; 51(3): 1112 - 1114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
J. Vouillamoz, P. Moreillon, M. Giddey, and J. M. Entenza
Efficacy of daptomycin in the treatment of experimental endocarditis due to susceptible and multidrug-resistant enterococci
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., December 1, 2006; 58(6): 1208 - 1214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
N. A. C. Potz, R. Hope, M. Warner, A. P. Johnson, D. M. Livermore, and on behalf of the London & South East ESBL Project
Prevalence and mechanisms of cephalosporin resistance in Enterobacteriaceae in London and South-East England
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., August 1, 2006; 58(2): 320 - 326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
M. Chen, A. N. Nafziger, G. L. Drusano, L. Ma, and J. S. Bertino Jr.
Comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic target attainment of ertapenem in normal-weight, obese, and extremely obese adults.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., April 1, 2006; 50(4): 1222 - 1227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
L. Alou, L. Aguilar, D. Sevillano, M.-J. Gimenez, F. Cafini, E. Valero, M.-T. Relano, and J. Prieto
Urine bactericidal activity against resistant Escherichia coli in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model simulating urine concentrations obtained after 2000/125 mg sustained-release co-amoxiclav and 400 mg norfloxacin administration
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., April 1, 2006; 57(4): 714 - 719.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
C. H. Jones, M. Tuckman, A. Y. M. Howe, M. Orlowski, S. Mullen, K. Chan, and P. A. Bradford
Diagnostic PCR Analysis of the Occurrence of Methicillin and Tetracycline Resistance Genes among Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Phase 3 Clinical Trials of Tigecycline for Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., February 1, 2006; 50(2): 505 - 510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
D. F. J. Brown, D. I. Edwards, P. M. Hawkey, D. Morrison, G. L. Ridgway, K. J. Towner, M. W. D. Wren, and on behalf of the Joint Working Party of the Britis
Guidelines for the laboratory diagnosis and susceptibility testing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., December 1, 2005; 56(6): 1000 - 1018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
D. M. Livermore
Tigecycline: what is it, and where should it be used?
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., October 1, 2005; 56(4): 611 - 614.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
G. A. Pankey
Tigecycline
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., September 1, 2005; 56(3): 470 - 480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
A. P. Johnson, A. Pearson, and G. Duckworth
Surveillance and epidemiology of MRSA bacteraemia in the UK
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., September 1, 2005; 56(3): 455 - 462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
T. Whitehouse, J. A. Cepeda, R. Shulman, L. Aarons, R. Nalda-Molina, C. Tobin, A. MacGowan, S. Shaw, C. Kibbler, M. Singer, et al.
Pharmacokinetic studies of linezolid and teicoplanin in the critically ill
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., March 1, 2005; 55(3): 333 - 340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
N. Woodford, M. E. Ward, M. E. Kaufmann, J. Turton, E. J. Fagan, D. James, A. P. Johnson, R. Pike, M. Warner, T. Cheasty, et al.
Community and hospital spread of Escherichia coli producing CTX-M extended-spectrum {beta}-lactamases in the UK
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., October 1, 2004; 54(4): 735 - 743.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.