JAC Advance Access published online on April 29, 2004
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dkh231
© 2004 by The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Centre for Virology, Department of Infection, Royal Free
and University College Medical School of UCL, Hampstead Site, Rowland
Hill Street, London NW3 2PF, UK
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: d.clark{at}rfc.ucl.ac.uk.
Objectives: Re-activation of porcine
cytomegalovirus (PCMV) in the xenograft has been reported in pig-to-baboon
models of xenotransplantation and is associated with invasive disease
and consumptive coagulopathy. If xenotransplantation of porcine
organs into human recipients is to proceed, donor organs will have
to be free from a wide range of infectious agents including PCMV.
However, it is prudent to characterize the antiviral susceptibility
of this virus. We therefore investigated the effect of selected
antiviral agents, currently licensed for the treatment of human
herpesvirus infections, on PCMV replication. Methods: Antiviral susceptibility was determined
using real-time PCR and indirect immunofluorescence measurements
in a porcine fallopian tube cell line infected with PCMV. Results: PCMV replication was significantly
inhibited by ganciclovir and cidofovir (both EC50 < 1
mg/L) and to a lesser extent by foscarnet (EC50 within
range 25-50 mg/L) and aciclovir (EC50 > 25
mg/L). Conclusions: These results show that, if it
proves necessary, ganciclovir and cidofovir should be considered
as first-line drugs to treat PCMV infections in xenograft recipients.
Revised March 5, 2004
Accepted March 9, 2004
Original article
Susceptibility of porcine cytomegalovirus to antiviral
drugs
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. C.-J. Cheeran, J. R. Lokensgard, and M. R. Schleiss Neuropathogenesis of Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection: Disease Mechanisms and Prospects for Intervention Clin. Microbiol. Rev., January 1, 2009; 22(1): 99 - 126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
