JAC Advance Access published online on March 24, 2004
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dkh165
© 2004 by The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Original article
1 Servizio di Virologia, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo,
27100 Pavia, Italy
* Corresponding author. E-mail: g.gerna{at}smatteo.pv.it.
Received 26 September 2003
; revised 28 January 2004
; accepted 3 February 2004
Objective: A novel rapid reverse transcriptase
(RT) recombinant HIV-1 drug-susceptibility assay was developed to
evaluate resistance to RT inhibitors. Material and methods: HIV-1 RTs from five treatment-naive
and 10 highly active antiretroviral therapy-experienced patients
were evaluated. HIV-1 isolates recovered by culturing peripheral
blood mononuclear cells from patients were used in the conventional
isolate phenotype analysis. Recombinant HIV-1 strains were obtained
by cloning the RT gene amplified from the supernatant of HIV-1 cultures
in a plasmid carrying the HIV-1 strain HXB2 backbone, and the most
represented clone for each virus isolate was then tested for antiviral
drug susceptibility in parallel with HIV-1 isolates. Results: Comparison of conventional virus isolate
and the novel recombinant virus phenotypic assays showed a large
concordance of results. However, some discrepant results were observed,
in that higher drug-resistance levels were detected by the conventional
isolate phenotypic assay in HIV-1 isolates showing the presence
of a mixture of HIV-1 variants, whereas the novel recombinant phenotypic
assay could more precisely detect the level of drug resistance of
the single viral clones selected for the analysis. Discussion: The novel recombinant phenotype
assay, compared with the conventional virus isolate phenotype assay,
showed widely overlapping results. The comparison of the two assays
show that the conventional phenotypic assay is able to identify
more efficiently the combined effect of drug-resistant viral variants,
whereas the novel recombinant phenotypic assay is better able to
define the level of drug resistance of the single viral variants.
In addition, rapidity (2 weeks versus 4 weeks required by the reference
recombinant assay and 6 weeks required by the conventional virus
isolate phenotypic assay) is a major advantage of the novel assay.
Keywords: NRTIs, NNRTIs, IC50, HIV-1 isolates,
viral population
Novel recombinant phenotypic assay for clonal analysis
of reverse transcriptase mutations conferring drug resistance to
HIV-1 variants
2 Servizio di Virologia
and Laboratori Sperimentali
di Ricerca, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo,
27100 Pavia, Italy
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Paolucci, F. Baldanti, G. Maga, R. Cancio, M. Zazzi, M. Zavattoni, A. Chiesa, S. Spadari, and G. Gerna Gln145Met/Leu Changes in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Reverse Transcriptase Confer Resistance to Nucleoside and Nonnucleoside Analogs and Impair Virus Replication Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., December 1, 2004; 48(12): 4611 - 4617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
