Skip Navigation



JAC Advance Access published online on November 12, 2003

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dkh001
© 2003 by The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
52/6/920    most recent
dkh001v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Higa, F.
Right arrow Articles by Saito, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Higa, F.
Right arrow Articles by Saito, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2003 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Original article

In vitro and in vivo activity of olamufloxacin (HSR-903) against Legionella spp

Futoshi Higa 1 *, Noriko Arakaki 1 , Masao Tateyama 1 , Michio Koide 1 , Takashi Shinzato 1 , Kazuyoshi Kawakami 1 , and Atsushi Saito 1

1 First Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, 207 Uehara, Nishihara, Okinawa 903-0215, Japan

* Corresponding author. E-mail: fhiga{at}med.u-ryukyu.ac.jp.

Received 6 May 2003 ; revised 24 September 2003 ; accepted 1 October 2003

Abstract

The activity of the fluoroquinolone olamufloxacin (HSR-903) against Legionella spp. was studied in vitro and in vivo. The olamufloxacin MIC at which 50% of isolates are inhibited (MIC50) for 81 different Legionella spp. strains (59 type strains and 22 clinical isolates) was 0.008 mg/L, which was identical to sparfloxacin, whereas the MIC50s for erythromycin, levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin were 0.25, 0.032 and 0.032 mg/L, respectively. Olamufloxacin and sparfloxacin (at 0.008 mg/L) inhibited intracellular growth and subsequent cytotoxicity of L. pneumophila 80-045 in J774.1 macrophages, whereas levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin did not, at the same concentration. When olamufloxacin was given to the infected guinea pigs orally (5 mg/kg of body weight), peak levels in the lung were 3.02 mg/kg at 2 h post-administration, with a half-life of 3.41 h and an AUC0-12 of 12.31 mg·h/kg. The 2 day post-infection bacterial burden of the lung in the animals treated with olamufloxacin (5 and 1.25 mg/kg given orally twice a day) was much lower than in those treated with levofloxacin (same dose as olamufloxacin) or erythromycin (10 mg/kg given orally twice a day). When treated with olamufloxacin (5 mg/kg given orally twice a day) for 7 days, 11 of 12 L. pneumophila-infected guinea pigs survived for 14 days post-infection, as did all 12 guinea pigs treated with levofloxacin (5 mg/kg given orally twice a day) for 7 days. In contrast, only two of 12 animals treated with erythromycin survived and 10 of 11 died in the physiological saline group. Olamufloxacin was as effective as levofloxacin in a guinea pig model of Legionnaires’ disease. These data warrant further study of whether olamufloxacin is an option for the treatment of Legionella infections.

Keywords: fluoroquinolones, Legionnaires’ disease, Legionella pneumophila
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
F. Higa, M. Akamine, S. Haranaga, M. Tohyama, T. Shinzato, M. Tateyama, M. Koide, A. Saito, and J. Fujita
In vitro activity of pazufloxacin, tosufloxacin and other quinolones against Legionella species
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., December 1, 2005; 56(6): 1053 - 1057.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.