Skip Navigation



JAC Advance Access published online on July 1, 2003

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dkg317
© 2003 by The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
52/2/247    most recent
dkg317v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marier, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Ducharme, M. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marier, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Ducharme, M. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2003 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Original article

Liposomal tobramycin against pulmonary infections of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a pharmacokinetic and efficacy study following single and multiple intratracheal administrations in rats

J. F. Marier 1 , J. L. Brazier 2 , J. Lavigne 3 , and M. P. Ducharme 1 *

1 Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC; MDS Pharma Services, 2350 Cohen Street, St-Laurent (Montreal), QC, Canada
2 Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC
3 MDS Pharma Services, 2350 Cohen Street, St-Laurent (Montreal), QC, Canada

* Corresponding author. E-mail: Murray.Ducharme{at}mdsps.com.

Received 4 October 2002 ; revised 9 April 2003 ; accepted 6 May 2003

Abstract

Objective: To determine the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of tobramycin against pulmonary infections of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in rats after intratracheal administration of conventional and liposomal formulations.

Methods: Male Sprague-Dawley rats were inoculated with 106 cfu of a mucoid variant of P. aeruginosa (MIC of tobramycin for PA 508 = 1 mg/L) and tobramycin (conventional or liposomal formulations) was administered in single (490 µg) and multiple dose (490 µg during 4 days) experiments. Rats were killed at multiple time points to determine the residual cfu of P. aeruginosa and tobramycin amounts in lungs. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using a two-compartment model with NONMEM.

Results: Mean (±S.D.) elimination half-life (t1/2{beta}) and pulmonary exposure (AUC) of the conventional formulation were 14.0 ±4.0 h and 663 ±89 µgxh/lungs, respectively. The pharmacokinetic profile of liposomal tobramycin was markedly different, with a longer t1/2{beta} (34.4 ±5 h, P < 0.05), resulting in an increased AUC (3890 ±560 µgxh/lungs, P < 0.05). {chi}2 analyses were carried out on cfu data distributed in the following categories: below 103, 103-105, and above 105 cfu. In the single dose experiments, approximately 90% of the observations were above 105 cfu for both formulations. Significant differences in cfu distribution were observed after multiple treatments, with approximately 10% of the observations falling below 103 cfu of P. aeruginosa for the conventional formulation versus 30% for the liposomal formulation.

Conclusion: The liposomal formulation of tobramycin promoted drug retention in lungs and improved its efficacy after multiple treatments.

Keywords: pharmacokinetics, efficacy, liposomal tobramycin, P. aeruginosa
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
P. Meers, M. Neville, V. Malinin, A. W. Scotto, G. Sardaryan, R. Kurumunda, C. Mackinson, G. James, S. Fisher, and W. R. Perkins
Biofilm penetration, triggered release and in vivo activity of inhaled liposomal amikacin in chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infections
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., April 1, 2008; 61(4): 859 - 868.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.