JAC Advance Access published online on May 29, 2003
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dkg278
© 2003 by The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Original article
1 Department of Medical
Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg,
Manitoba; Departments of Clinical
Microbiology and Medicine,
Health Sciences Centre, MS673-820 Sherbrook Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba,
Canada R3A 1R9
* Corresponding author. E-mail: ggzhanel{at}pcs.mb.ca.
Received 19 December 2002
; revised 2 April 2003
; accepted 6 April 2003
Background: The association between
macrolide resistance mechanisms and bacteriological eradication
of Streptococcus pneumoniae remains poorly studied.
The present study, using an in vitro pharmacodynamic model,
assessed azithromycin activity against macrolide-susceptible and
-resistant S. pneumoniae simulating clinically
achievable free serum (S), epithelial lining fluid (ELF) and middle
ear fluid (MEF) concentrations. Materials and methods: Two macrolide-susceptible [PCR-negative
for both mef(A) and erm(B)] and
six macrolide-resistant [five mef(A)-positive/erm(B)-negative displaying various degrees of macrolide
resistance and one mef(A)-negative/erm(B)-positive] S. pneumoniae were tested. Azithromycin was modelled
simulating a dosage of 500 mg/250 mg by mouth, once a day [free
S: maximum concentration (Cmax) 0.2
mg/L, t1/2 68 h; free ELF Cmax 1.0
mg/L, t1/2 68 h] and 10 mg/kg
by mouth, once a day (free MEF: Cmax 1.0
mg/L, t1/2 68 h) using a one compartment
model. Starting inocula were 1 x 106 cfu/mL
in Mueller-Hinton broth with 2% lysed horse blood.
Sampling at 0, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h assessed the extent of bacterial
killing (decrease in log10 cfu/mL versus initial inoculum). Results: Free azithromycin concentrations in
serum, ELF and MEF simulating time above the MIC (T > MIC)
of 100% [area under the curve to MIC (AUC0-24/MIC] Conclusion: Azithromycin serum, ELF and MEF
concentrations rapidly eradicated macrolide-susceptible S. pneumoniae but
did not eradicate macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae regardless
of resistance phenotype.
Keywords: azithromycin, pharmacodynamics, Streptococcus
pneumoniae
Pharmacodynamic activity of azithromycin against
macrolide-susceptible and -resistant Streptococcus
pneumoniae simulating clinically achievable free serum, epithelial
lining
fluid and middle ear fluid concentrations
2 Department of Medical
Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg,
Manitoba
3 Department of Medical
Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg,
Manitoba; Department of Clinical
Microbiology, Health Sciences Centre, MS673-820 Sherbrook Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba,
Canada R3A 1R9
36.7] were bactericidal (
3 log10 killing) at 24 and
48 h versus macrolide-susceptible S. pneumoniae.
Against macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae, free
serum concentrations providing T > MIC
of 0% or AUC0-24/MIC
1.1
demonstrated no bacterial inhibition followed by regrowth at 24
and 48 h, whereas free ELF and MEF providing T > MIC
of 0% or AUC0-24/MIC of 4.6 produced a
bacteriostatic (0.2-0.5 log10 killing at 24
h) effect with a mef(A) strain with an azithromycin
MIC of 2 mg/L. Against mef(A)-positive S.
pneumoniae strains with azithromycin MICs
4
mg/L, no bacterial killing occurred at any time point and rapid
regrowth was observed simulating ELF or MEF T > MIC
of 0% or AUC0-24/MIC
2.3.![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. J. Farrell, T. M. File, and S. G. Jenkins Prevalence and Antibacterial Susceptibility of mef(A)-Positive Macrolide-Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae over 4 Years (2000 to 2004) of the PROTEKT US Study J. Clin. Microbiol., February 1, 2007; 45(2): 290 - 293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. DeRyke, X. Du, and D. P. Nicolau Evaluation of bacterial kill when modelling the bronchopulmonary pharmacokinetic profile of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin against parC-containing isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae J. Antimicrob. Chemother., September 1, 2006; 58(3): 601 - 609. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Sevillano, L. Alou, L. Aguilar, O. Echevarria, M.-J. Gimenez, and J. Prieto Azithromycin iv pharmacodynamic parameters predicting Streptococcus pneumoniae killing in epithelial lining fluid versus serum: an in vitro pharmacodynamic simulation J. Antimicrob. Chemother., June 1, 2006; 57(6): 1128 - 1133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. G. Zhanel, C. Johanson, N. Laing, T. Hisanaga, A. Wierzbowski, and D. J. Hoban Pharmacodynamic Activity of Telithromycin at Simulated Clinically Achievable Free-Drug Concentrations in Serum and Epithelial Lining Fluid against Efflux (mefE)-Producing Macrolide- Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae for Which Telithromycin MICs Vary Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., May 1, 2005; 49(5): 1943 - 1948. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. G. Zhanel, C. Johanson, T. Hisanaga, C. Mendoza, N. Laing, A. Noreddin, A. Wierzbowski, and D. J. Hoban Pharmacodynamic activity of telithromycin against macrolide-susceptible and macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae simulating clinically achievable free serum and epithelial lining fluid concentrations J. Antimicrob. Chemother., December 1, 2004; 54(6): 1072 - 1077. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. R. Reinert Clinical efficacy of ketolides in the treatment of respiratory tract infections J. Antimicrob. Chemother., June 1, 2004; 53(6): 918 - 927. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


