JAC Advance Access published online on June 12, 2003
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dkg268
© 2003 by The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Original article
1 Public Health Research
Institute, 225 Warren St., Newark, NJ 07103, USA
* Corresponding author. E-mail: drlica{at}phri.org.
Received 11 November 2002
; revised 4 March 2003
; accepted 2 April 2003
The effect of antimicrobial concentration on colony-forming
ability of resistant mutant subpopulations of Mycobacterium
smegmatis and Staphylococcus aureus was measured
for chloramphenicol, erythromycin, moxifloxacin, penicillin and
tetracycline. The relationship between drug concentration and the
recovery of mutant colonies was distinct for each bacterium-antimicrobial
combination; however, in each case application of large numbers
of cells to drug-containing agar plates revealed a progressive reduction
in mutant recovery as antimicrobial concentration increased. The
minimal concentration that allowed no mutant recovery from more
than 1010 input cells was measured to estimate the minimum
inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the least susceptible, single-step
mutant subpopulation, a parameter also called the mutant prevention
concentration (MPC). These data expand the number of antimicrobial-bacterial
combinations for which a mutant selection window can be measured.
Keywords: erythromycin, moxifloxacin, penicillin, tetracycline,
chloramphenicol
Effect of chloramphenicol, erythromycin, moxifloxacin,
penicillin and tetracycline concentration on the recovery of resistant
mutants of Mycobacterium smegmatis and Staphylococcus
aureus
2 Departments of Clinical Microbiology, St.
Paul's Hospital (Grey Nuns') and Saskatoon and
District Health; Department of Pathology,
Royal University Hospital and the Department of Microbiology and
Immunology,
University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. E. T. Stearne, W. H. F. Goessens, J. W. Mouton, and I. C. Gyssens Effect of Dosing and Dosing Frequency on the Efficacy of Ceftizoxime and the Emergence of Ceftizoxime Resistance during the Early Development of Murine Abscesses Caused by Bacteroides fragilis and Enterobacter cloacae Mixed Infection Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., October 1, 2007; 51(10): 3605 - 3611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. H. F. Goessens, J. W. Mouton, M. T. ten Kate, A. J. Bijl, A. Ott, and I. A. J. M. Bakker-Woudenberg Role of ceftazidime dose regimen on the selection of resistant Enterobacter cloacae in the intestinal flora of rats treated for an experimental pulmonary infection J. Antimicrob. Chemother., March 1, 2007; 59(3): 507 - 516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. L. Marcusson, S. K. Olofsson, P. K. Lindgren, O. Cars, and D. Hughes Mutant prevention concentrations of ciprofloxacin for urinary tract infection isolates of Escherichia coli J. Antimicrob. Chemother., June 1, 2005; 55(6): 938 - 943. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J Epstein, J. G Gums, and K. Drlica The Changing Face of Antibiotic Prescribing: The Mutant Selection Window Ann. Pharmacother., October 1, 2004; 38(10): 1675 - 1682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Drlica The mutant selection window and antimicrobial resistance J. Antimicrob. Chemother., July 1, 2003; 52(1): 11 - 17. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


