Skip Navigation



JAC Advance Access published online on May 13, 2003

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dkg264
© 2003 by The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
51/6/1389    most recent
dkg264v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Kasteren, M. E. E.
Right arrow Articles by Gyssens, I. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Kasteren, M. E. E.
Right arrow Articles by Gyssens, I. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2003 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Original article

Adherence to local hospital guidelines for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: a multicentre audit in Dutch hospitals

M. E. E. van Kasteren 1*, B. J. Kullberg 1, A. S. de Boer 2, J. Mintjes-de Groot 3, I. C. Gyssens 4

1 Department of Internal Medicine 541, University Medical Centre Nijmegen, and Nijmegen University Centre for Infectious Diseases, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen
2 National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, RIVM, Bilthoven
3 Dutch Institute for Healthcare Improvement, CBO Utrecht
4 Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

* Corresponding author. E-mail: M.vanKasteren{at}aig.umcn.nl.

Received 14 November 2002 ; revised 1 January 2003 ; accepted 25 March 2003

Abstract

Objective: To study the adherence to local hospital guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery, and explore reasons for non-adherence.

Methods: A prospective, multicentre audit of elective procedures, without prior suspicion of infection, was carried out in 13 Dutch hospitals. By reviewing medical, anaesthetic and nursing records, and medication charts, the prescription of antibiotics was compared with the local hospital guideline on antibiotic choice, duration of prophylaxis, dose, dosing interval and timing of the first dose.

Results: Between January 2000 and January 2001, 1763 procedures were studied. Antibiotic choice, duration, dose, dosing interval and timing of the first dose were concordant with the hospital guideline in 92%, 82%, 89%, 43% and 50%, respectively. Overall adherence to all aspects of the guideline, however, was achieved in only 28%. The most important barriers to local guideline adherence were lack of awareness due to ineffective distribution of the most recent version of the guidelines, lack of agreement by surgeons with the local hospital guidelines, and environmental factors, such as organizational constraints in the surgical suite and in the ward.

Conclusion: This study shows that, although adherence to separate aspects of local hospital guidelines for surgical prophylaxis in the Netherlands is favourable, overall adherence to all parameters is hard to achieve. Adherence to guidelines on dosing interval and timing needs improvement, in particular. To increase the quality of antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery, effort should be put into developing guidelines acceptable to surgeons, in adequately distributing the guidelines and to facilitating logistics. Audits of surgical prophylaxis may help hospitals identify barriers to guideline adherence.

Keywords: antibiotic policy, adherence
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
C. E. Tourmousoglou, E. Ch. Yiannakopoulou, V. Kalapothaki, J. Bramis, and J. St. Papadopoulos
Adherence to guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis in general surgery: a critical appraisal
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., January 1, 2008; 61(1): 214 - 218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
M. E. E. van Kasteren, J. Mannien, B.-J. Kullberg, A. S. de Boer, N. J. Nagelkerke, M. Ridderhof, J. C. Wille, and I. C. Gyssens
Quality improvement of surgical prophylaxis in Dutch hospitals: evaluation of a multi-site intervention by time series analysis
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., December 1, 2005; 56(6): 1094 - 1102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
S. B. Voit, J. K. Todd, B. Nelson, and A.-C. Nyquist
Electronic Surveillance System for Monitoring Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis
Pediatrics, December 1, 2005; 116(6): 1317 - 1322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
P. Malacarne, C. Rossi, G. Bertolini, and for the GiViTI group
Antibiotic usage in intensive care units: a pharmaco-epidemiological multicentre study
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., July 1, 2004; 54(1): 221 - 224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.