Skip Navigation



JAC Advance Access published online on January 28, 2003

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dkg110
© 2003 by The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
51/3/727    most recent
dkg110v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Andrews, J.
Right arrow Articles by Gajjar, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Andrews, J.
Right arrow Articles by Gajjar, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2003 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Original article

Concentrations of garenoxacin in plasma, bronchial mucosa, alveolar macrophages and epithelial lining fluid following a single oral 600 mg dose in healthy adult subjects

J. Andrews 1*, D. Honeybourne 2, G. Jevons 1, M. Boyce 3, R. Wise 1, A. Bello 4, D. Gajjar 4

1 Department of Medical Microbiology, City Hospital NHS Trust, Birmingham
2 Department of Respiratory Medicine, Heartlands NHS Trust, Birmingham
3 Hammersmith Medicines Research Ltd, Central Middlesex Hospital, London, UK
4 Bristol-Myers Squibb, USA

* Corresponding author. E-mail: jenny.Andrews{at}cityhospbham.wmids.nhs.uk.

Received 27 August 2002 ; revised 7 November 2002 ; accepted 3 December 2002

Abstract

A microbiological assay was used to measure concentrations of garenoxacin (BMS-284756) in plasma, bronchial mucosa (BM), alveolar macrophages (AM) and epithelial lining fluid (ELF), following a single 600 mg oral dose. Twenty-four healthy subjects were allocated into four nominal time intervals after the dose, 2.5-3.5, 4.5-5.5, 10.5-11.5 and 23.5-24.5 h. Mean concentrations in plasma, BM, AM and ELF, respectively, for the four nominal time windows were for 2.5-3.5 h 10.0 mg/L (S.D. 2.8), 7.0 mg/kg (S.D. 1.3), 106.1 mg/L (S.D. 60.3) and 9.2 mg/L (S.D. 3.6); 4.5-5.5 h 8.7 mg/L (S.D. 2.2), 6.0 mg/kg (S.D. 1.9), 158.6 mg/L (S.D. 137.4) and 14.3 mg/L (S.D. 8.2); 10.5-11.5 h 6.1 mg/L (S.D. 1.9), 4.0 mg/kg (S.D. 1.4), 76.0 mg/L (S.D. 47.7) and 7.9 mg/L (S.D. 4.6); and 23.5-24.5 h 2.1 mg/L (S.D. 0.5), 1.7 mg/kg (S.D. 0.7), 30.7 mg/L (S.D. 12.9) and 3.3 mg/L (S.D. 2.3). Concentrations at all sites exceeded MIC90s for the common respiratory pathogens Haemophilus influenzae (0.03 mg/L), Moraxella catarrhalis (0.015 mg/L) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (0.06 mg/L). These data suggest that garenoxacin should be effective in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Keywords: garenoxacin, concentrations, respiratory tree
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
S. Kiem and J. J. Schentag
Interpretation of Antibiotic Concentration Ratios Measured in Epithelial Lining Fluid
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., January 1, 2008; 52(1): 24 - 36.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
G. G. Zhanel, J. James, S. Derkatch, N. Laing, A. M. Noreddin, and D. J. Hoban
Pharmacodynamic activity of garenoxacin against ciprofloxacin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., July 1, 2006; 58(1): 112 - 116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
R. P. Smith, A. L. Baltch, W. J. Ritz, A. N. Carpenter, T. A. Halse, and L. H. Bopp
In Vitro Activities of Garenoxacin and Levofloxacin against Chlamydia pneumoniae Are Not Affected by Presence of Mycoplasma DNA
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., June 1, 2004; 48(6): 2081 - 2084.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.