JAC Advance Access published online on January 14, 2003
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dkg084
© 2003 by The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brief report
1 Department of Microbiological R&D, Statens Serum
Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark
* Corresponding author. E-mail: abp{at}ssi.dk.
Received 12 June 2002
; revised 17 October 2002
; accepted 11 November 2002
The EVIGENE MRSA Detection Kit was evaluated on coagulase-negative
staphylococci (CoNS) from agar plates and on staphylococci directly
from positive spiked blood cultures. For the CoNS study, a total
of 242 isolates were tested, and of these 237 gave valid test results.
For the 237 valid tests, all gave correct mecA classification.
For the blood culture procedure, a collection of 51 mecA-positive Staphylococcus aureus, 21 mecA-negative S. aureus, 31 mecA-positive CoNS
and 28 mecA-negative CoNS were used for the simulated
blood cultures. For the S. aureus strains, all
gave valid test results and correct mecA classification.
One of the MRSA isolates gave a very faint nuc signal,
and another four isolates gave results close to the cut-off of the
kit; however, these were still clearly positive when read by the
naked eye. For the CoNS isolates, 51 of the 59 strains
gave valid results. All of these 51 strains gave correct mecA status.
Thus the EVIGENE MRSA Detection Kit can provide fast and accurate
determination of methicillin resistance in CoNS. This preliminary
study of the blood culture procedure indicates that it is possible
to achieve determination of methicillin resistance in staphylococci
8 h after positivity of the blood culture, making same-day detection
of methicillin resistance possible.
Keywords: MRSA, blood culture, coagulase-negative staphylococci, mecA, methicillin resistance determination
Detection of methicillin resistance in coagulase-negative
staphylococci and in staphylococci directly from simulated blood
cultures using the EVIGENE MRSA Detection Kit
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B-A. Tenhagen, A. Fetsch, B. Stuhrenberg, G. Schleuter, B. Guerra, J. A. Hammerl, S. Hertwig, J. Kowall, U. Kampe, A. Schroeter, et al. Prevalence of MRSA types in slaughter pigs in different German abattoirs Vet Rec., November 14, 2009; 165(20): 589 - 593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Schnellmann, V. Gerber, A. Rossano, V. Jaquier, Y. Panchaud, M. G. Doherr, A. Thomann, R. Straub, and V. Perreten Presence of New mecA and mph(C) Variants Conferring Antibiotic Resistance in Staphylococcus spp. Isolated from the Skin of Horses before and after Clinic Admission J. Clin. Microbiol., December 1, 2006; 44(12): 4444 - 4454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Skov, R. Smyth, A. R. Larsen, N. Frimodt-Moller, and G. Kahlmeter Evaluation of cefoxitin 5 and 10 {micro}g discs for the detection of methicillin resistance in staphylococci J. Antimicrob. Chemother., February 1, 2005; 55(2): 157 - 161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. B. Poulsen, R. Skov, and L. Pallesen Detection of Low-Level Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus with Commercially Available Tests J. Clin. Microbiol., July 1, 2003; 41(7): 3458 - 3458. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


