Skip Navigation



JAC Advance Access published online on January 6, 2003

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dkg052
© 2003 by The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
51/2/323    most recent
dkg052v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simonsen, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Sundsfjord, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Simonsen, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Sundsfjord, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2003 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Original article

Prevalence of resistance to ampicillin, gentamicin and vancomycin in Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium isolates from clinical specimens and use of antimicrobials in five Nordic hospitals

G. S. Simonsen 1, L. Småbrekke 1, D. L. Monnet 2, T. L. Sørensen 2, J. K. Møller 3, K. G. Kristinsson 4, A. Lagerqvist-Widh 5, E. Torell 5, A. Digranes 6, S. Harthug 6, A. Sundsfjord 7*

1 University of Tromsø and University Hospital of North Norway (UNN)
2 Statens Serum Institut, Denmark
3 Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
4 Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
5 Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden
6 Haukeland University Hospital, Norway
7 University of Tromsø and University Hospital of North Norway (UNN); Reference Center for Detection of Antimicrobial Resistance, UNN, Norway

* Corresponding author. E-mail: arnfinns{at}fagmed.uit.no.

Received 24 September 2002 ; accepted 19 October 2002

Abstract

We determined the species distribution and prevalence of ampicillin resistance, high-level gentamicin resistance (HLGR) and vancomycin resistance among clinical enterococcal isolates from five Nordic laboratories (Bergen, Tromsø, Uppsala, Aarhus and Reykjavik). Isolates represented three different groups: (i) all blood culture isolates from 1999; (ii) consecutive in-patient isolates (maximum 40); and (iii) consecutive outpatient isolates (maximum 40) collected during March to May 2000. Antimicrobial use data were collected at the national and hospital level. A high proportion (31.4%) of Enterococcus faecium was detected among blood culture isolates, in contrast to only 4.2% among isolates from outpatients. Ampicillin resistance was not found in Enterococcus faecalis, in contrast to 48.8% in E. faecium isolates. HLGR rates varied considerably between laboratories (1.1-27.6%). Acquired vancomycin resistance was not detected. There were no significant differences in the prevalences of HLGR between in-patient and outpatient isolates at individual hospitals. A cluster of clonally related ampicillin-resistant and HLGR E. faecium isolates was demonstrated in one of the hospitals. The lowest level of hospital antimicrobial use, the lowest proportion of E. faecium and the lowest prevalence of resistance were observed in Reykjavik.The study showed a relatively low level of resistance in enterococci, as compared with most European countries and the USA. However, there were large differences between hospitals with regard to the relative proportion of E. faecium isolates, their susceptibility to ampicillin and gentamicin, as well as the prevalence of HLGR in E. faecalis isolates. This indicates a potential for further improvement of antibiotic policies, and possibly hospital infection control, to maintain the low resistance levels observed in these countries.

Keywords: enterococci, antimicrobial resistance, antimicrobial use
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
C. H. Lester, D. Sandvang, S. S. Olsen, H. C. Schonheyder, J. O. Jarlov, J. Bangsborg, D. S. Hansen, T. G. Jensen, N. Frimodt-Moller, A. M. Hammerum, et al.
Emergence of ampicillin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in Danish hospitals
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., December 1, 2008; 62(6): 1203 - 1206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
J. Top, R. Willems, S. van der Velden, M. Asbroek, and M. Bonten
Emergence of Clonal Complex 17 Enterococcus faecium in The Netherlands
J. Clin. Microbiol., January 1, 2008; 46(1): 214 - 219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
I. Kuhn, A. Iversen, M. Finn, C. Greko, L. G. Burman, A. R. Blanch, X. Vilanova, A. Manero, H. Taylor, J. Caplin, et al.
Occurrence and Relatedness of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci in Animals, Humans, and the Environment in Different European Regions
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., September 1, 2005; 71(9): 5383 - 5390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
J. Top, L. M. Schouls, M. J. M. Bonten, and R. J. L. Willems
Multiple-Locus Variable-Number Tandem Repeat Analysis, a Novel Typing Scheme To Study the Genetic Relatedness and Epidemiology of Enterococcus faecium Isolates
J. Clin. Microbiol., October 1, 2004; 42(10): 4503 - 4511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
A. Sullivan, A. Johansson, B. Svenungsson, and C. E. Nord
Effect of Lactobacillus F19 on the emergence of antibiotic-resistant microorganisms in the intestinal microflora
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., October 1, 2004; 54(4): 791 - 797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
B. Lund and C. Edlund
Bloodstream Isolates of Enterococcus faecium Enriched with the Enterococcal Surface Protein Gene, esp, Show Increased Adhesion to Eukaryotic Cells
J. Clin. Microbiol., November 1, 2003; 41(11): 5183 - 5185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.