Skip Navigation



JAC Advance Access published online on November 18, 2002

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dkg006
© 2002 by The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
50/6/1059    most recent
dkg006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Drago, L.
Right arrow Articles by Gismondo, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Drago, L.
Right arrow Articles by Gismondo, M. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2002 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

In Brief

Bactericidal activity of levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, penicillin, meropenem and rokitamycin against Bacillus anthracis clinical isolates

Lorenzo Drago 1*, Elena De Vecchi 1, Alessandra Lombardi 1, Lucia Nicola 1, Marilena Valli 1, Maria Rita Gismondo 1

1 Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology, L. Sacco Teaching Hospital, University of Milan, Via GB Grassi 74, 20157 Milan, Italy

* Corresponding author. E-mail: microbio{at}mailserver.unimi.it.

Received 30 May 2002 ; revised 18 July 2002 ; accepted 22 September 2002

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the bactericidal rates of levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, penicillin, meropenem and rokitamycin against seven isolates of Bacillus anthracis clinically isolated between 1960 and 1970. After determination of MIC and MBC, time-kill experiments were carried out. Antimicrobial activity was evaluated at concentrations equal to 1 x, 2 x, 4 x and 8 x MIC after 0, 3, 6, 12 and 24 h of incubation with the drugs. Bactericidal activity was defined as a decrease in bacterial count of at least 3 log10. All the isolates were susceptible to all the antibiotics, by considering the antistaphylococcal breakpoints. Levofloxacin was bactericidal at 1 x MIC after 24 h and at 4 x MIC after 12 h, and gatifloxacin was bactericidal at 2 x MIC after 24 h and at 8 x MIC after 12 h. Meropenem, rokitamycin and penicillin also showed bactericidal activity at concentrations of 4 x and 8 x MIC, respectively, but only after 24 h incubation; after the same time, meropenem and rokitamycin showed a more marked killing than penicillin at 2 x MIC.

Keywords: Bacillus anthracis, anthrax, fluoroquinolones, penicillin, meropenem, rokitamycin, macrolides, in vitro susceptibility testing
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
V. A. Luna, D. S. King, J. Gulledge, A. C. Cannons, P. T. Amuso, and J. Cattani
Susceptibility of Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus mycoides, Bacillus pseudomycoides and Bacillus thuringiensis to 24 antimicrobials using Sensititre(R) automated microbroth dilution and Etest(R) agar gradient diffusion methods
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., September 1, 2007; 60(3): 555 - 567.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
J. Steward, M. S. Lever, A. J. H. Simpson, A. M. Sefton, and T. J. G. Brooks
Post-exposure prophylaxis of systemic anthrax in mice and treatment with fluoroquinolones
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., July 1, 2004; 54(1): 95 - 99.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
A. Athamna, M. Massalha, M. Athamna, A. Nura, B. Medlej, I. Ofek, D. Bast, and E. Rubinstein
In vitro susceptibility of Bacillus anthracis to various antibacterial agents and their time-kill activity
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., February 1, 2004; 53(2): 247 - 251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.