JAC Advance Access published online on November 1, 2002
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dkf241
© 2002 by The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Original Paper
1 Department of Microbiology & Infection
Control, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario,
Canada; University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario,
Canada
* Corresponding author. E-mail: Zafar.hussain{at}lhsc.on.ca.
Received 18 January 2002
; revised 28 August 2002
; accepted 10 September 2002
Objectives: To determine in
vitro susceptibilities of a large series of speciated coagulase-negative
staphylococci (CNS) against three new antibiotics, linezolid, quinupristin/dalfopristin and
telithromycin. Methods: Susceptibilities to three new antibiotics
and oxacillin, vancomycin, clindamycin and erythromycin were determined
by the agar dilution method, as described by the NCCLS. Results: Resistance to linezolid was not observed
in any isolates, although MIC90 values varied between
species. Fifteen of 658 (2.3%) isolates were resistant
to quinupristin/dalfopristin, but <1% of the clinically
most important isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus haemolyticus and Staphylococcus
hominis demonstrated resistance to this agent. Susceptibility to
clindamycin correlated with susceptibility to quinupristin/dalfopristin;
however, resistance to clindamycin did not predict quinupristin/dalfopristin
resistance. Telithromycin was the least active of the new agents
tested, showing activity similar to that of clindamycin. Susceptibility and
resistance to clindamycin were predictive of susceptibility and
resistance to telithromycin. Conclusion: Clindamycin susceptibility can be
used as a surrogate marker for susceptibility to quinupristin/dalfopristin
and telithromycin. Quinupristin/dalfopristin and linezolid show
good activity against both mecA-positive and -negative
CNS.
In vitro activity of quinupristin/dalfopristin,
linezolid, telithromycin and comparator antimicrobial agents against
13 species of coagulase-negative staphylococci
2 Department of Microbiology & Infection
Control, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario,
Canada
3 Department of Microbiology & Infection
Control, London Health Sciences Centre; University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario,
Canada
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Miragaia, J. A. Carrico, J. C. Thomas, I. Couto, M. C. Enright, and H. de Lencastre Comparison of Molecular Typing Methods for Characterization of Staphylococcus epidermidis: Proposal for Clone Definition J. Clin. Microbiol., January 1, 2008; 46(1): 118 - 129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Trueba, E. Garrabe, R. Hadef, R. Fabre, J.-D. Cavallo, K. Tsvetkova, and O. Chesneau High Prevalence of Teicoplanin Resistance among Staphylococcus epidermidis Strains in a 5-Year Retrospective Study. J. Clin. Microbiol., May 1, 2006; 44(5): 1922 - 1923. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
