JAC Advance Access published online on October 8, 2002
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, doi:10.1093/jac/dkf191
© 2002 by The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Original Paper
1 Medical Microbiology,
Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZN
* Corresponding author. E-mail: f.m.mackenzie{at}abdn.ac.uk.
Received 30 November 2001
; revised 20 March 2002
; accepted 1 August 2002
The study objective was to screen both methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) isolates from blood cultures for
reduced susceptibility to vancomycin and teicoplanin. A total of
72 MRSA and 143 MSSA isolates were screened on brain-heart
infusion agar containing either 4 mg/L vancomycin or 8 mg/L teicoplanin,
using an inoculum of
Identification and characterization of teicoplanin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus blood culture isolates in
NE Scotland
2 Scottish MRSA Reference Laboratory,
Microbiology Department, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 84 Castle Street,
Glasgow G4 0SF, UK
106 organisms.
MICs were determined by Etest, broth microdilution and agar incorporation.
Isolates were characterized by PFGE, mecA and nuc PCR, transmission electron microscopy (TEM)
and analysis of cell proteins (proteomics). Based on British Society
for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC) breakpoints, seven MRSAs and
seven MSSAs were teicoplanin resistant, with MICs of up to 16 and
24 mg/L respectively, but were vancomycin sensitive. Based on higher
NCCLS breakpoints, five MRSAs and six MSSAs were teicoplanin intermediate, vancomycin
sensitive. All the MRSAs belonged to the EMRSA-16 clone and subdivided
into two groups. The MSSAs belonged to five different clones. TEM
showed the resistant variants to have slightly thicker cell walls
than sensitive variants. Most notably, the resistant variants possessed characteristic
dark, granular material concentrated in the middle of the cells,
believed to be chromosome. Proteomics showed the resistant variants
to overexpress phosphoglycerate kinase. Both MRSA and MSSA with
reduced teicoplanin susceptibility may remain vancomycin sensitive
by NCCLS and BSAC criteria and it is important to screen clinical
isolates of MRSA and MSSA for reduced susceptibility to both agents.![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. S. Soliman, G. Phillips, P. Whitty, and D. H. Edwards Distribution of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus spa types isolated from health-care workers and patients in a Scottish university teaching hospital J. Med. Microbiol., September 1, 2009; 58(9): 1190 - 1195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Rossney, A. C. Shore, P. M. Morgan, M. M. Fitzgibbon, B. O'Connell, and D. C. Coleman The Emergence and Importation of Diverse Genotypes of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Harboring the Panton-Valentine Leukocidin Gene (pvl) Reveal that pvl Is a Poor Marker for Community-Acquired MRSA Strains in Ireland J. Clin. Microbiol., August 1, 2007; 45(8): 2554 - 2563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Stepanovic, T. Hauschild, I. Dakic, Z. Al-Doori, M. Svabic-Vlahovic, L. Ranin, and D. Morrison Evaluation of Phenotypic and Molecular Methods for Detection of Oxacillin Resistance in Members of the Staphylococcus sciuri Group. J. Clin. Microbiol., March 1, 2006; 44(3): 934 - 937. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Shittu, J. Lin, D. Morrison, and D. Kolawole Identification and molecular characterization of mannitol salt positive, coagulase-negative staphylococci from nasal samples of medical personnel and students. J. Med. Microbiol., March 1, 2006; 55(Pt 3): 317 - 324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. F. J. Brown, D. I. Edwards, P. M. Hawkey, D. Morrison, G. L. Ridgway, K. J. Towner, M. W. D. Wren, and on behalf of the Joint Working Party of the Britis Guidelines for the laboratory diagnosis and susceptibility testing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) J. Antimicrob. Chemother., December 1, 2005; 56(6): 1000 - 1018. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Dakic, D. Morrison, D. Vukovic, B. Savic, A. Shittu, P. Jezek, T. Hauschild, and S. Stepanovic Isolation and Molecular Characterization of Staphylococcus sciuri in the Hospital Environment J. Clin. Microbiol., June 1, 2005; 43(6): 2782 - 2785. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Wilcox, D. Nathwani, and M. Dryden Linezolid compared with teicoplanin for the treatment of suspected or proven Gram-positive infections J. Antimicrob. Chemother., February 1, 2004; 53(2): 335 - 344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Shittu, J. Lin, D. Morrison, and D. Kolawole Isolation and molecular characterization of multiresistant Staphylococcus sciuri and Staphylococcus haemolyticus associated with skin and soft-tissue infections J. Med. Microbiol., January 1, 2004; 53(1): 51 - 55. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Cepeda, S. Hayman, T. Whitehouse, C. C. Kibbler, D. Livermore, M. Singer, and A. P. R. Wilson Teicoplanin resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an intensive care unit J. Antimicrob. Chemother., September 1, 2003; 52(3): 533 - 534. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Dancer, A. Robb, A. Crawford, and D. Morrison Oral streptogramins in the management of patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections J. Antimicrob. Chemother., March 1, 2003; 51(3): 731 - 735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


