Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on March 17, 2009
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2009 63(5):1025-1033; doi:10.1093/jac/dkp088
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
63/5/1025    most recent
dkp088v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tessmer, A.
Right arrow Articles by Suttorp, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tessmer, A.
Right arrow Articles by Suttorp, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Original research

Impact of intravenous β-lactam/macrolide versus β-lactam monotherapy on mortality in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia

A. Tessmer1,*, T. Welte2, P. Martus3, M. Schnoor4, R. Marre5 and N. Suttorp1

1 Department of Infectious Disease and Respiratory Medicine, Charité-University Medicine, Berlin, Germany 2 Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Medical University Hannover, Hannover, Germany 3 Department of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité-University Medicine, Berlin, Germany 4 Institute of Social Medicine, Medical University Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Germany 5 Department of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Ulm, Germany

Received 2 November 2008; returned 29 November 2008; revised 18 February 2009; accepted 21 February 2009


* Corresponding author. Medical Department of Infectious Disease and Respiratory Medicine, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum and Campus Mitte, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany. Tel: +49-30-653326; Fax: +49-30-553906; E-mail: antje.tessmer{at}charite.de

Objectives: Guidelines recommend dual-therapy consisting of a β-lactam/macrolide (BLM) for hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Nevertheless, the superiority over β-lactam-monotherapy (BL) remains unproven.

Methods: Analyses from an observational study initiated by the German competence network CAPNETZ were performed.

Results: One thousand eight hundred and fifty-four patients were treated with either BL (49.0%) or BLM (51.0%). BLM therapy was associated with lower adjusted 14 day mortality [odds ratio (OR) 0.53; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.30–0.94]. CRB65, neoplastic disease, age and nursing home residency were confirmed as independent predictors of death. Adjusted 14 day mortality risk was clearly reduced in patients with CRB65 = 2 (n = 411; OR 0.35; CI: 0.12–0.99) and CRB65 ≥ 2 (n = 519; OR 0.42; CI: 0.18–0.997). However, this could not be shown for adjusted 30 day mortality. Patients with CRB65 ≤ 1 showed low mortality (2.1%) without the influence of BLM. BLM therapy was associated with lower adjusted risk of treatment failure at 14 days (n = 1854; OR 0.65; CI: 0.47–0.89) and 30 days (OR 0.69; CI: 0.51–0.94) as well as in the subgroup of patients with CRB65 = 2 and CRB65 ≥ 2.

Conclusions: This study suggests the superiority of BLM therapy in patients with CRB65 risk classes of 2 or higher on 14 day mortality. BLM therapy was also associated with lower risk of treatment failure.

Keywords: antibiotic therapy , community-acquired infection , treatment failure


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.