Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on December 4, 2008
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2009 63(2):353-356; doi:10.1093/jac/dkn491
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
63/2/353    most recent
dkn491v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Soriano, F.
Right arrow Articles by Ponte, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Soriano, F.
Right arrow Articles by Ponte, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Original research

In vitro activity of ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin, vancomycin and erythromycin against planktonic and biofilm forms of Corynebacterium urealyticum

Francisco Soriano*, Lorena Huelves, Plinio Naves, Violeta Rodríguez-Cerrato, Gema del Prado, Vicente Ruiz and Carmen Ponte

Department of Medical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain

Received 14 August 2008; returned 31 October 2008; revised 5 November 2008; accepted 5 November 2008


* Corresponding author. Tel: +34-915447387; Fax: +34-915494764; E-mail: fsoriano{at}fjd.es

Objectives: To study the ability of Corynebacterium urealyticum to produce biofilms and to compare the in vitro activity of antimicrobials against planktonic and biofilm-associated organisms.

Methods: Biofilm formation on polystyrene plates by three C. urealyticum strains was studied in artificial urine under static conditions. The bactericidal activities of ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin, vancomycin and erythromycin were studied against biofilm-associated organisms, and the results were compared with those obtained against planktonic organisms. Persister biofilm-associated organisms of each strain exposed to antibiotics were retested to determine the MIC of the same antibiotic.

Results: The three strains tested consistently produced biofilms. Planktonic organisms was susceptible to ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin and vancomycin, and their MBC values were two to eight times higher than their corresponding MICs. Bactericidal effect on biofilm-associated organisms required very high antibiotic concentrations; the minimum biofilm bactericidal concentrations for ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin and vancomycin ranged from 128 to ≥1024 times their respective MBCs for planktonic organisms. Erythromycin was not bactericidal against either planktonic or biofilm-associated organisms for the single susceptible strain tested. Persister biofilm-associated organisms exposed to erythromycin increased their MIC by a factor >8000, but no changes in susceptibility were observed with the other compounds.

Conclusions: This work demonstrates that C. urealyticum produces biofilms on polystyrene plates and biofilm-associated organisms are much less susceptible to the bactericidal effect of the antibiotics; and the exposure of C. urealyticum to erythromycin may favour resistance selection. Overall, these results may explain the difficulties for bacterial eradication in chronic infections caused by C. urealyticum.

Keywords: bactericidal , eradication , resistance , device-related infections , polystyrene


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.