Skip Navigation

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2008 62(Supplement 1):i29-i40; doi:10.1093/jac/dkn249
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vasilev, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vasilev, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

This article appears in the following Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy issue: Tigecycline, a therapeutic option from a new antimicrobial class (the glycylcyclines) in an era of increasing resistance [View the issue table of contents]

Articles

A Phase 3, open-label, non-comparative study of tigecycline in the treatment of patients with selected serious infections due to resistant Gram-negative organisms including Enterobacter species, Acinetobacter baumannii and Klebsiella pneumoniae

Krasimir Vasilev1, Galina Reshedko2, Remus Orasan3, Miguel Sanchez4, Juri Teras5, Tim Babinchak6,*, Gary Dukart6, Angel Cooper6, Nathalie Dartois7, Hassan Gandjini7, Russ Orrico6, Evelyn Ellis-Grosse6,{dagger} on behalf of the 309 Study Group

1 Clinic of Endoscopic Surgery, Military Medical Academy, 3, Georgi Sofiiski Str, 1606 Sofia, Bulgaria 2 Institute of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy of Smolensk State Medical Academy, 28 Krupskaya Str, 214019 Smolensk, Smolensk Regional Hospital, 27 Prospekt, Gagarina, 214018 Smolensk, Russia 3 Clinical County Hospital Cluj-Napoca Str, Cliniclor nr. 3-5 Cluj-Napoca, Romania 4 Hospital Clinico San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain 5 North Estonia Regional Hospital, Mustamae Centre, Sutiste tee 19, Tallinn 13419, Estonia 6 Wyeth Research, Collegeville, PA, USA 7 Wyeth Research, Paris, France


* Corresponding author. Tel: +1-484-865-8818; Fax: +1-484-865-9262; E-mail: babinct{at}wyeth.com

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tigecycline in patients with selected serious infections caused by resistant Gram-negative bacteria, or failures who had received prior antimicrobial therapy or were unable to tolerate other appropriate antimicrobials. Secondary objectives included an evaluation of the microbiological efficacy of tigecycline and in vitro activity of tigecycline for resistant Gram-negative bacteria.

Methods: This open-label, Phase 3, non-comparative, multicentre study assessed the efficacy and safety of intravenous tigecycline (100 mg initially, then 50 mg 12 hourly for 7–28 days) in hospitalized patients with serious infections including complicated intra-abdominal infection; complicated skin and skin structure infection (cSSSI); community-acquired pneumonia (CAP); hospital-acquired pneumonia, including ventilator-associated pneumonia; or bacteraemia, including catheter-related bacteraemia. All patients had infections due to resistant Gram-negative organisms, including extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing strains, or had failed on prior therapy or could not receive (allergy or intolerance) one or more agents from three classes of commonly used antibiotics. The primary efficacy endpoint was clinical response in the microbiologically evaluable (ME) population at test of cure (TOC). Safety data included vital signs, laboratory tests and adverse events (AEs).

Results: In the ME population at TOC, the clinical cure rate was 72.2% [95% confidence interval (CI): 54.8–85.8], and the microbiological eradication rate was 66.7% (95% CI: 13.7–78.8). The most commonly isolated resistant Gram-negative pathogens were Acinetobacter baumannii (47%), Escherichia coli (25%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (16.7%) and Enterobacter spp. (11.0%); the most commonly diagnosed serious infection was cSSSI (67%). The most common treatment-emergent AEs were nausea (29.5%), diarrhoea (16%) and vomiting (16%), which were mild or moderate in severity.

Conclusions: In this non-comparative study, tigecycline appeared safe and efficacious in patients with difficult-to-treat serious infections caused by resistant Gram-negative organisms.

Keywords: tetracyclines , multidrug resistance , clinical trials


{dagger} Present address: e2g Biopharmaceutical Consulting, 994 Skelp Level Road, Downingtown, PA 19335, USA


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
G. G. Zhanel, P. J. Baudry, F. Tailor, L. Cox, D. J. Hoban, and J. A. Karlowsky
Determination of the pharmacodynamic activity of clinically achievable tigecycline serum concentrations against clinical isolates of Escherichia coli with extended-spectrum {beta}-lactamases, AmpC {beta}-lactamases and reduced susceptibility to carbapenems using an in vitro model
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., October 1, 2009; 64(4): 824 - 828.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
A. M. Nicasio, J. L. Crandon, and D. P. Nicolau
In Vivo Pharmacodynamic Profile of Tigecycline against Phenotypically Diverse Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., July 1, 2009; 53(7): 2756 - 2761.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
P. Koomanachai, A. Kim, and D. P. Nicolau
Pharmacodynamic evaluation of tigecycline against Acinetobacter baumannii in a murine pneumonia model
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., May 1, 2009; 63(5): 982 - 987.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
N. C. Gordon and D. W. Wareham
A review of clinical and microbiological outcomes following treatment of infections involving multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii with tigecycline
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., April 1, 2009; 63(4): 775 - 780.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.