Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on January 25, 2008
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2008 61(3):616-620; doi:10.1093/jac/dkm518
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
61/3/616    most recent
dkm518v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Espinel-Ingroff, A.
Right arrow Articles by Troke, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Espinel-Ingroff, A.
Right arrow Articles by Troke, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Original research

Activities of voriconazole, itraconazole and amphotericin B in vitro against 590 moulds from 323 patients in the voriconazole Phase III clinical studies

Ana Espinel-Ingroff1, Elizabeth Johnson2, Hans Hockey3 and Peter Troke4,*

1 Virginia Commonwealth University, Medical Centre, Richmond, VA, USA 2 Health Protection Agency, Myrtle Road, Kingsdown, Bristol, UK 3 Nevada Road, Hamilton 3216, New Zealand 4 The Old Court, Kingsgate, CT10 3LW Kent, UK

Received 3 October 2007; returned 26 November 2007; revised 9 November 2007; accepted 5 December 2007


* Corresponding author. Tel: +44-1843-863900; E-mail: peter2troke{at}btinternet.com

Introduction: Fungal pathogens from the voriconazole trials were identified and tested for susceptibility at two reference laboratories.

Methods: MICs were measured using CLSI M38-A 48 h microdilution methodology.

Results: Moulds from 29 genera and 38 species were isolated from 18 countries. Aspergillus spp. predominated (69%), followed by Scedosporium spp. (11.5%). Aspergillus fumigatus (292/590, 49.5%) was the most common species, followed by Scediosporium apiospermum (9.7%) and Aspergillus terreus (7.3%). The bronchi, lungs and sinuses yielded 45% of the isolates (57% of aspergilli), with 24% from the oropharynx/oesophagus. Other sites included blood/catheter (7.3%) and CNS (5.2%). MIC90s of itraconazole and voriconazole for Aspergillus spp. were the same (0.5 mg/L), but 17 Aspergillus isolates were itraconazole-resistant (MICs ≥1–16 mg/L). Additionally, in 31 A. fumigatus and 23 A. terreus isolates, amphotericin MICs were ≥2.0 mg/L. Voriconazole MICs exceeded 4 mg/L in only 5.8% (34/590) of the isolates, including one A. fumigatus (8.0 mg/L), 9/11 Scedosporium prolificans, 10/13 Fusarium solani and all 9 Zygomycetes. Most were also not susceptible to itraconazole or amphotericin B. A notable increase in MIC (more than two doubling dilutions) during voriconazole therapy was seen for one A. fumigatus isolate. The response rate of voriconazole-treated patients with isolate MICs ≥4.0 mg/L was 38% when compared with 52% for those with MICs <4.0 mg/L.

Conclusions: Voriconazole shows activity, in vitro, similar to that of itraconazole against a wide range of moulds. It is also active against some isolates not susceptible to itraconazole or amphotericin B, but not the Zygomycetes. The relationship between voriconazole MIC and clinical outcome requires further study.

Keywords: Aspergillus , Scedosporium , Fusarium , Zygomycetes , MIC , clinical outcome


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
J. W. Baddley, K. A. Marr, D. R. Andes, T. J. Walsh, C. A. Kauffman, D. P. Kontoyiannis, J. I. Ito, S. A. Balajee, P. G. Pappas, and S. A. Moser
Patterns of Susceptibility of Aspergillus Isolates Recovered from Patients Enrolled in the Transplant-Associated Infection Surveillance Network
J. Clin. Microbiol., October 1, 2009; 47(10): 3271 - 3275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
M. J. Seidler, S. Salvenmoser, and F.-M. C. Muller
Aspergillus fumigatus Forms Biofilms with Reduced Antifungal Drug Susceptibility on Bronchial Epithelial Cells
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., November 1, 2008; 52(11): 4130 - 4136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
P. Troke, K. Aguirrebengoa, C. Arteaga, D. Ellis, C. H. Heath, I. Lutsar, M. Rovira, Q. Nguyen, M. Slavin, S. C. A. Chen, et al.
Treatment of Scedosporiosis with Voriconazole: Clinical Experience with 107 Patients
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., May 1, 2008; 52(5): 1743 - 1750.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.