Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on March 12, 2007
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2007 59(5):1025-1030; doi:10.1093/jac/dkm063
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
59/5/1025    most recent
dkm063v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mushtaq, S.
Right arrow Articles by Livermore, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mushtaq, S.
Right arrow Articles by Livermore, D. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Activity of faropenem against cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae

Shazad Mushtaq, Russell Hope, Marina Warner and David M. Livermore*

Antibiotic Resistance Monitoring and Reference Laboratory, Health Protection Agency Centre for Infections, London NW9 5EQ, UK

Received 6 December 2006; returned 29 January 2007; revised 8 February 2007; accepted 8 February 2007


* Corresponding author. Tel +44-208-327-7227; Fax: +44-208-327-6264; E-mail: david.livermore{at}hpa.org.uk

Background: There is a need for new oral agents active against extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL) producers, as these increasingly cause community-onset infections. We therefore evaluated faropenem, a penem in Phase III development, against recently collected oxyimino-cephalosporin-resistant bacteria.

Methods: We tested 847 consecutive cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae collected at 16 centres in South-East England in 2004, 501 of them with CTX-M enzymes; we also tested reference strains and transconjugants with acquired ß-lactamases and various modes of AmpC expression. MICs were determined by the BSAC agar dilution method.

Results: Modal MICs of faropenem for Escherichia coli or Klebsiella spp. with CTX-M or non-CTX-M ESBLs or high-level AmpC enzyme were 0.5–1 mg/L, with over 95% of producers susceptible to ≤2 mg/L. Modal MICs for Enterobacter and Citrobacter spp. with ESBLs or derepressed AmpC were 2–4 mg/L, although around 5% of AmpC-derepressed Enterobacter spp. required faropenem MICs of 16 mg/L. MICs of 8–16 mg/L were seen also for most AmpC-derepressed Serratia spp. isolates. Derepression of AmpC in isogenic mutant series typically raised faropenem MICs by one doubling dilution; among the ß-lactamases introduced into E. coli, only NMC-A (Class A) and IMP (Class B) carbapenemases caused substantive rises in faropenem MICs.

Conclusions: Faropenem has good activity against E. coli and Klebsiella spp. with ESBLs, including the CTX-M types now proliferating in Europe, but was less active against AmpC-derepressed and ESBL-producing Enterobacter spp. Its clinical utility will depend on levels achieved in the urinary tract, the site of most of the community infections caused by ESBL producers, and more work is needed in this area.

Keywords: penems , ESBLs , AmpC ß-lactamases


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
D. M. Livermore
Has the era of untreatable infections arrived?
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., September 1, 2009; 64(suppl_1): i29 - i36.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.