Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on August 26, 2006
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2006 58(5):960-965; doi:10.1093/jac/dkl356
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
58/5/960    most recent
dkl356v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Odenholt, I.
Right arrow Articles by Cars, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Odenholt, I.
Right arrow Articles by Cars, O.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Pharmacodynamics of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli: simulation of human plasma concentrations after intravenous dosage in an in vitro kinetic model

Inga Odenholt1,2,* and Otto Cars2

1 Infectious Diseases Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lunds University S-20502 Malmö, Sweden 2 Antibiotic Research Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, Section of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Uppsala University Uppsala, Sweden

Received 10 November 2005; returned 10 May 2006; revised 13 July 2006; accepted 8 August 2006


*Corresponding author. Tel: +46-40-331806; Fax: +46-40-336279; E-mail: inga.odenholt{at}med.lu.se

Objectives: To compare in an in vitro kinetic model the pharmacodynamics of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin with a concentration–time profile simulating the human free non-protein bound concentrations of 400 mg moxifloxacin intravenous (iv) once daily, 500 mg levofloxacin iv once daily and 750 mg levofloxacin iv once daily against strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli with variable susceptibility to fluoroquinolones.

Methods: The strains used in the study included S. pneumoniae ATCC 6306 (native strain), S. pneumoniae 19397 (double mutation; gyrA and parC), S. pneumoniae 4241 (single mutation; parC), S. aureus ATCC 13709 (native strain), S. aureus MB5 (single mutation; gyrA), E. coli M12 (single mutation; gyrA), E. coli ATCC 25922 (native strain) and K. pneumoniae ATCC 29655 (native strain). The strains were exposed to moxifloxacin and levofloxacin in an in vitro kinetic model simulating the free human serum concentration–time profile of moxifloxacin 400 mg once daily, levofloxacin 500 mg once daily and 750 mg once daily. Repeated samples were taken regularly during 24 h and viable counts were carried out.

Results and conclusions: A correlation was seen between both the area under the serum concentration curve and MIC (AUC/MIC) and the peak concentration/MIC (Cmax/MIC) versus area under the bactericidal killing curve (AUBKC) or {Delta}log0–24 cfu/mL. Compiling all data, an AUC/MIC of ~100 and a Cmax/MIC of 10 gave a maximal bactericidal effect for both levofloxacin and moxifloxacin. In accordance with the results from others, our study indicated that a lower AUC/MIC was needed for S. pneumoniae in comparison with the Gram-negative bacteria studied. Moxifloxacin yielded higher AUC/MIC and Cmax/MIC against the investigated Gram-positive bacteria in comparison with levofloxacin 500 mg once daily and 750 mg once daily.

Keywords: fluoroquinolones , pharmacokinetics , PK/PD


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
R. Singh, K. R. Ledesma, K.-T. Chang, J.-G. Hou, R. A. Prince, and V. H. Tam
Pharmacodynamics of moxifloxacin against a high inoculum of Escherichia coli in an in vitro infection model
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., September 1, 2009; 64(3): 556 - 562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Clin PharmacolHome page
S. Schmidt, R. Banks, V. Kumar, K. H. Rand, and H. Derendorf
Clinical Microdialysis in Skin and Soft Tissues: An Update
J. Clin. Pharmacol., March 1, 2008; 48(3): 351 - 364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
S. K. Olofsson, L. L. Marcusson, A. Stromback, D. Hughes, and O. Cars
Dose-related selection of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., October 1, 2007; 60(4): 795 - 801.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
I. Odenholt, E. Lowdin, and O. Cars
Pharmacodynamic Effects of Telavancin against Methicillin-Resistant and Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Strains in the Presence of Human Albumin or Serum and in an In Vitro Kinetic Model
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., September 1, 2007; 51(9): 3311 - 3316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.