Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on May 18, 2006
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2006 58(1):125-132; doi:10.1093/jac/dkl177
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
58/1/125    most recent
dkl177v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Khan, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Owais, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Khan, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Owais, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Toxicity, stability and pharmacokinetics of amphotericin B in immunomodulator tuftsin-bearing liposomes in a murine model

Masood A. Khan{dagger} and Mohd Owais*

Interdisciplinary Biotechnology Unit, Aligarh Muslim University Aligarh-202002, India

Received 13 August 2005; returned 5 October 2005; revised 17 March 2006; accepted 8 April 2006


*Corresponding author. Tel: +91-571-2720388; Fax: +91-0571-2721776; E-mail: owais_lakhnawi{at}yahoo.com

Objectives: In the present study we evaluated the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of amphotericin B in immunomodulator tuftsin-loaded liposomes in a murine model.

Methods: Stability of amphotericin B liposomes was tested by incubating one volume of liposomal formulations of amphotericin B with nine volumes of serum. The pharmacokinetics of amphotericin B in Candida albicans-infected mice treated with conventional and tuftsin-loaded amphotericin B liposomes was evaluated over a period of 24 h. In vitro toxicity of amphotericin B deoxycholate, as well as amphotericin B liposomes, was tested by incubation with human erythrocytes for 1 h at 37°C. To assess amphotericin B-induced in vivo toxicity, BALB/c mice were injected with three doses of amphotericin B deoxycholate, as well as amphotericin B liposomal formulations on days 1, 2 and 3 post C. albicans infection. Blood from treated mice was taken by retro-orbital puncture to test renal function parameters such as serum creatinine and urea.

Results: In vitro stability studies revealed that tuftsin-bearing amphotericin B liposomes released only 11% of the total liposomal amphotericin B in the serum, while it was found to be 19% from identical tuftsin-free amphotericin B liposomes. Both tuftsin-loaded as well as tuftsin-free liposomal formulations of amphotericin B induced ~20% haemolysis of erythrocytes at a dose of 40 mg/L, while the same amount of drug in amphotericin B deoxycholate caused 100% lysis of the erythrocytes. Pharmacokinetic studies revealed that subsequent to administration of various formulations of amphotericin B, there was 32 mg/L amphotericin B in the systemic circulation of mice treated with tuftsin-bearing amphotericin B liposomes, while it was 25 mg/L for amphotericin B liposomes, 4 h post drug administration. In vivo toxicity studies demonstrated that the amphotericin B deoxycholate formulation induced elevations in serum creatinine (~300% of control) and blood urea (~380% of control) values, while these values were substantially less (blood urea ~150% of control and serum creatinine ~210% of control) in the animals treated with the tuftsin-loaded amphotericin B liposomal formulation. Further, the administration of amphotericin B deoxycholate (1 mg/kg) in BALB/c mice at a dose of 1 mg/kg body weight led to the accumulation of 18.6 ± 5.25 g/kg (of amphotericin B) in kidneys. On the other hand, administration of liposomal amphotericin B and tuftsin-bearing liposomal amphotericin B at a dose of 5 mg/kg body weight resulted in accumulation of 8.8 ± 2.0 and 4.0 ± 1.6 g/kg of amphotericin B, respectively, in the kidneys of treated animals.

Conclusions: Co-administration of immunomodulator tuftsin along with liposomal formulations of amphotericin B successfully minimizes toxicity, as well as other side effects of the drug. Interestingly, tuftsin also increased the stability of liposomal amphotericin B. Superior efficacy, reliable safety and favourable pharmacodynamics of tuftsin-loaded amphotericin B liposomes suggest their potential therapeutic value in the management of fungal infections.

Keywords: antifungal agents , C. albicans , renal function tests , erythrocytes


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.