Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on March 8, 2006
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2006 57(5):966-969; doi:10.1093/jac/dkl061
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
57/5/966    most recent
dkl061v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lüthje, P.
Right arrow Articles by Schwarz, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lüthje, P.
Right arrow Articles by Schwarz, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Antimicrobial resistance of coagulase-negative staphylococci from bovine subclinical mastitis with particular reference to macrolide–lincosamide resistance phenotypes and genotypes

Petra Lüthje and Stefan Schwarz*

Institut für Tierzucht, Bundesforschungsanstalt für Landwirtschaft (FAL), Höltystrasse 10, 31535 Neustadt-Mariensee, Germany

Received 28 November 2005; returned 28 December 2005; revised 24 January 2006; accepted 14 February 2006

* Corresponding author. Tel: +49-5034-871-241; Fax: +49-5034-871-246; E-mail: stefan.schwarz{at}fal.de

Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyse coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) for their resistance to antimicrobial agents approved for the control of pathogens involved in bovine mastitis, with particular reference to macrolide and/or lincosamide (ML) resistance and the resistance genes involved.

Methods: A total of 298 CoNS collected between 2003 and 2005 in Germany from cases of subclinical mastitis in dairy cows were identified to the species level and investigated for their MICs by broth microdilution. ML-resistant isolates were subjected to plasmid profiling and electrotransformation experiments. The ML resistance genes were detected using PCR and hybridization. Selected PCR products were cloned and sequenced.

Results: The CoNS isolates used in this study showed a low level of resistance to all antimicrobial agents tested (0–7.4%) except ampicillin (18.1%). In the erythromycin-resistant and/or pirlimycin-resistant isolates, the ML resistance genes erm(B), erm(C), msr(A), mph(C) and lnu(A) were present, either alone or in different combinations. Isolates carrying erm methylase genes or the exporter gene msr(A) showed higher MICs than those harbouring only the genes mph(C) or lnu(A) coding for inactivating enzymes. Most of the ML resistance genes were found on plasmids.

Conclusions: This is the first report of pirlimycin MICs for CoNS collected from cases of bovine subclinical mastitis in Germany. After 3–5 years of veterinary therapeutic use, pirlimycin resistance was rarely detected among CoNS. The finding that five different resistance genes—present in various combinations—were responsible for ML resistance underlines the heterogeneous character of this resistance trait.

Keywords: erythromycin , pirlimycin , Staphylococcus , erm gene , lnu(A) gene , mph(C) gene , msr(A) gene


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
K. Kadlec, R. Ehricht, S. Monecke, U. Steinacker, H. Kaspar, J. Mankertz, and S. Schwarz
Diversity of antimicrobial resistance pheno- and genotypes of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 from diseased swine
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., December 1, 2009; 64(6): 1156 - 1164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
E. Petinaki, V. Guerin-Faublee, V. Pichereau, C. Villers, A. Achard, B. Malbruny, and R. Leclercq
Lincomycin Resistance Gene lnu(D) in Streptococcus uberis
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., February 1, 2008; 52(2): 626 - 630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
S. F. Nunes, R. Bexiga, L. M. Cavaco, and C. L. Vilela
Technical Note: Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Portuguese Isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis in Subclinical Bovine Mastitis
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2007; 90(7): 3242 - 3246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
P. Luthje, M. von Kockritz-Blickwede, and S. Schwarz
Identification and characterization of nine novel types of small staphylococcal plasmids carrying the lincosamide nucleotidyltransferase gene lnu(A)
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., April 1, 2007; 59(4): 600 - 606.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
P. Luthje and S. Schwarz
Molecular analysis of constitutively expressed erm(C) genes selected in vitro in the presence of the non-inducers pirlimycin, spiramycin and tylosin
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., January 1, 2007; 59(1): 97 - 101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.