JAC Advance Access originally published online on March 10, 2006
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2006 57(5):959-962; doi:10.1093/jac/dkl076
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Antimicrobial practice |
Failure to implement hospital antimicrobial prescribing guidelines: a comparison of two UK academic centres
1 Clinical Pharmacology Unit, University of Edinburgh, Queen's Medical Research Institute, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Little France, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, UK; 2 Department of Medical Microbiology, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
Received 11 November 2005; returned 20 December 2005; revised 13 February 2006; accepted 19 February 2006
* Corresponding author. Tel: +131-242-9332; E-mail: s.maxwell{at}ed.ac.uk
Background: Rational antimicrobial therapy should provide maximum benefit to patients while minimizing the development of resistant microorganisms.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate (i) which antimicrobial drugs were chosen by hospital doctors faced with two common infections [community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and urinary tract infection (UTI)], (ii) whether these choices were compliant with local guidance and (iii) the factors that influenced antimicrobial choice.
Methods: A questionnaire based on two hypothetical clinical scenarios was distributed to 316 hospital doctors across four UK NHS hospitals in two cities (Newcastle and Edinburgh).
Results: Doctors in Newcastle were significantly more aggressive in their management: more patients were admitted (CAP: 78.9% versus 48.4%, P < 0.05) and given antimicrobials intravenously (CAP: 53.4% versus 21.2%, P < 0.05). Adherence to the local hospital guideline for CAP was significantly higher in Newcastle (83.3% versus 38.0%; P < 0.05). Fewer than half of the doctors surveyed used the local hospital guideline when choosing an antimicrobial, and the British National Formulary was the most frequently used resource (>90%). Junior doctors also identified medical school teaching and opinions of senior doctors as important influences.
Conclusions: This study highlights inadequacies in the implementation and promotion of local guidelines, and demonstrates the potential for widely varying antimicrobial practices in two comparable UK cities.
Keywords: junior doctors , medical education , formulary
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. J. Dawson Antimicrobial prescribing education programmes J. Antimicrob. Chemother., January 1, 2009; 63(1): 220 - 221. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Mahungu, O. Fajemisin, and I. C. J. W. Bowler Failure to implement hospital antimicrobial prescribing guidelines: experience in another UK academic centre J. Antimicrob. Chemother., February 1, 2007; 59(2): 332 - 332. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|