Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on February 7, 2006
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2006 57(4):767-770; doi:10.1093/jac/dkl013
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
57/4/767    most recent
dkl013v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sandoe, J. A. T.
Right arrow Articles by Wilcox, M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sandoe, J. A. T.
Right arrow Articles by Wilcox, M. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Measurement of ampicillin, vancomycin, linezolid and gentamicin activity against enterococcal biofilms

Jonathan A. T. Sandoe1,2,*, Joanne Wysome2, Andrew P. West2, John Heritage2 and Mark H. Wilcox1,2

1 Department of Microbiology, The General Infirmary at Leeds, Leeds, LS1 3EX, UK; 2 Division of Microbiology, The University of Leeds, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK

Received 30 June 2005; returned 17 August 2005; revised 6 January 2006; accepted 9 January 2006


* Correspondence address. Department of Microbiology, Old Medical School, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, LS1 3EX, UK. Tel: +44-113-343-5634; Fax: +44-113-343-5638; E-mail: jonathan.sandoe{at}leedsth.nhs.uk

Background: Enterococci frequently cause biofilm infections but susceptibility of clinical isolates growing in biofilms has not been investigated. The minimum biofilm eradicating concentration (MBEC) has been suggested as a guide to treatment of biofilm infections. We measured an alternative endpoint, the minimum biofilm inhibitory concentration (MBIC) and compared the results with MIC and MBC.

Objectives: To compare the MIC, MBC and MBIC of ampicillin, vancomycin and linezolid against enterococcal biofilms, to assess the impact of additional gentamicin and correlate findings with clinical outcome.

Methods: MIC and MBC were measured using standard techniques. MBICs were measured using a modification of the Calgary biofilm device method. Fifty-eight enterococcal isolates from episodes of intravascular catheter-related bloodstream infection were tested.

Results: Tolerance to ampicillin, vancomycin and linezolid was seen in 93%, 100% and 93% of isolates, respectively. MIC90s of ampicillin, vancomycin and linezolid were all 4 mg/L for Enterococcus faecalis isolates. MBC90s of ampicillin, vancomycin and linezolid for E. faecalis isolates were 1024, >128 and 2048 mg/L, respectively. MBIC90s of ampicillin, vancomycin and linezolid for E. faecalis isolates were 8192, 4096 and 4096 mg/L, respectively. Results for Enterococcus faecium were similar for vancomycin and linezolid but this species was generally more resistant to ampicillin. Adding 10 mg/L gentamicin had a variable effect on MIC, MBC or MBIC, which was not predictable by gentamicin susceptibility on disc testing.

Conclusions: Very high concentrations of ampicillin, vancomycin and linezolid are required to inhibit enterococcal biofilms in vitro. Combining these agents with gentamicin significantly reduced MIC, MBC and MBIC against only a proportion of enterococcal isolates. No correlation between MBIC and outcome was found.

Keywords: Enterococcus , enterococci , susceptibility , intravascular catheter-related bloodstream infections


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
V. C. Thomas, L. R. Thurlow, D. Boyle, and L. E. Hancock
Regulation of Autolysis-Dependent Extracellular DNA Release by Enterococcus faecalis Extracellular Proteases Influences Biofilm Development
J. Bacteriol., August 15, 2008; 190(16): 5690 - 5698.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
K. L. Frank, E. J. Reichert, K. E. Piper, and R. Patel
In Vitro Effects of Antimicrobial Agents on Planktonic and Biofilm Forms of Staphylococcus lugdunensis Clinical Isolates
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., March 1, 2007; 51(3): 888 - 895.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.