JAC Advance Access originally published online on May 29, 2003
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2003) 52, 89-95
© 2003 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Comparative efficacy of daptomycin and vancomycin in the therapy of experimental foreign body infection due to Staphylococcus aureus
Division of Infectious Diseases, Geneva University Hospital, CH-1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland
Received 8 January 203; returned 14 February 2003; revised 4 March 2003; accepted 6 April 2003
The therapeutic activity of daptomycin was compared with that of vancomycin in a rat model of subcutaneously implanted tissue cages chronically infected with strain Rev1, a spontaneous methicillin-susceptible revertant of the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain MRGR3, showing equivalent virulence to its parent. The MIC and MBC of daptomycin (in MuellerHinton broth supplemented with 50 mg/L Ca2+) or vancomycin for strain Rev1 were 12 and 24 or 1 and 2 mg/L, respectively. In vitro elimination of strain Rev1 in the presence of 50% tissue cage fluid was more rapid with daptomycin 4 mg/L compared with vancomycin. After 2 weeks of infection, viable counts of strain Rev1 averaged 6.49 log10 cfu/mL of tissue cage fluid (n = 87). Intraperitoneal administration of daptomycin 30 mg/kg once daily, or vancomycin 50 mg/kg twice daily, produced antibiotic levels continuously above MBC. After 7 days of therapy with daptomycin or vancomycin, mean ± S.E.M. counts of Rev1 decreased (P < 0.05) by 1.11 ± 0.25 (n = 28) or 0.80 ± 0.31 (n = 35) log10 cfu/mL, respectively, compared with cages of untreated animals, but were not significantly different from each other. In daptomycin-treated rats, three cages yielded subpopulations with reduced susceptibility to daptomycin. In conclusion, a low dose regimen of daptomycin was at least equivalent to vancomycin against chronic foreign body infections due to S. aureus. Drug dosage should be adapted to obtain inflammatory fluid levels of daptomycin minimizing emergence of resistant subpopulations.
Keywords: Gram-positive bacteria, chronic infections, antimicrobial agents
* Corresponding author. Tel: +41-22-37-29-826. Fax: +41-22-37-29-830; E-mail: pierre.vaudaux@hcuge.ch
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
O. Murillo, C. Garrigos, M. E. Pachon, G. Euba, R. Verdaguer, C. Cabellos, J. Cabo, F. Gudiol, and J. Ariza Efficacy of High Doses of Daptomycin versus Alternative Therapies against Experimental Foreign-Body Infection by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., October 1, 2009; 53(10): 4252 - 4257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Vaudaux, B. Fleury, A. Gjinovci, E. Huggler, M. Tangomo-Bento, and D. P. Lew Comparison of Tigecycline and Vancomycin for Treatment of Experimental Foreign-Body Infection Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., July 1, 2009; 53(7): 3150 - 3152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Traczewski, B. D. Katz, J. N. Steenbergen, and S. D. Brown Inhibitory and Bactericidal Activities of Daptomycin, Vancomycin, and Teicoplanin against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates Collected from 1985 to 2007 Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., May 1, 2009; 53(5): 1735 - 1738. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Hawkey Pre-clinical experience with daptomycin J. Antimicrob. Chemother., November 1, 2008; 62(suppl_3): iii7 - iii14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. LaPlante and L. A. Mermel In vitro activity of daptomycin and vancomycin lock solutions on staphylococcal biofilms in a central venous catheter model Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2007; 22(8): 2239 - 2246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Rouse, K. E. Piper, M. Jacobson, D. J. Jacofsky, J. M. Steckelberg, and R. Patel Daptomycin treatment of Staphylococcus aureus experimental chronic osteomyelitis J. Antimicrob. Chemother., February 1, 2006; 57(2): 301 - 305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. I. Raad, H. A. Hanna, M. Boktour, G. Chaiban, R. Y. Hachem, T. Dvorak, R. Lewis, and B. E. Murray Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium: Catheter Colonization, esp Gene, and Decreased Susceptibility to Antibiotics in Biofilm Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., December 1, 2005; 49(12): 5046 - 5050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Vaudaux, A. Gjinovci, M. Bento, D. Li, J. Schrenzel, and D. P. Lew Intensive Therapy with Ceftobiprole Medocaril of Experimental Foreign-Body Infection by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., September 1, 2005; 49(9): 3789 - 3793. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Schriever, C. Fernandez, K. A. Rodvold, and L. H. Danziger Daptomycin: A novel cyclic lipopeptide antimicrobial Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., June 1, 2005; 62(11): 1145 - 1158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. N. Steenbergen, J. Alder, G. M. Thorne, and F. P. Tally Daptomycin: a lipopeptide antibiotic for the treatment of serious Gram-positive infections J. Antimicrob. Chemother., March 1, 2005; 55(3): 283 - 288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



