Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on November 28, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
51/1/77    most recent
dkg011v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ulett, G. C.
Right arrow Articles by Norton, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ulett, G. C.
Right arrow Articles by Norton, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2003) 51, 77-81
© 2003 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

A comparison of antibiotic regimens in the treatment of acute melioidosis in a mouse model

Glen C. Ulett1, Robert Hirst1, Bruce Bowden2, Kellie Powell1 and Robert Norton3,*

Departments of 1 Microbiology and Immunology and 2 Chemistry, James Cook University; 3 Department of Clinical Microbiology, QHPS, Townsville Hospital, Townsville, Queensland 4814, Australia

Received 26 February 2002; returned 28 June 2002; revised 5 August 2002; accepted 12 September 2002

Melioidosis is caused by the Gram-negative bacillus Burkholderia pseudomallei. Most clinical reports of disease are from south-east Asia and northern Australia. The organism is intrinsically resistant to most commonly available antibiotics. Standard therapy includes ceftazidime either alone or in combination with co-trimoxazole. The clinical advantage in adding co-trimoxazole has never been determined; nor has the activity of newer, fourth-generation cephalosporins, such as cefepime, been studied in the treatment of this condition. BALB/c mice have been shown to represent an animal model of melioidosis. This animal model was used in this study to compare the efficacy of ceftazidime and cefepime alone or with co-trimoxazole, in the therapy of melioidosis. Antibiotic levels in the mice were determined by HPLC, and dosing was modified to keep plasma antibiotic levels at or above the MIC for the organism–antibiotic combination for a significant part of a 12 h period. Bacterial load, as determined by splenic counts, showed that ceftazidime in combination with co-trimoxazole was the most effective therapeutic option. The animal model described in this study can be used as a preliminary evaluation of therapeutic options for melioidosis.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +61-7-47961111; Fax: +61-7-47962415; E-mail: Robert_Norton{at}health.qld.gov.au


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
J. Buijs, A. S. M. Dofferhoff, J. W. Mouton, and J. W. M. van der Meer
Continuous administration of PBP-2- and PBP-3-specific {beta}-lactams causes higher cytokine responses in murine Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli sepsis
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., May 1, 2007; 59(5): 926 - 933.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
A. C. Cheng and B. J. Currie
Melioidosis: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Management
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., April 1, 2005; 18(2): 383 - 416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
T. J. J. Inglis, F. Rodrigues, P. Rigby, R. Norton, and B. J. Currie
Comparison of the Susceptibilities of Burkholderia pseudomallei to Meropenem and Ceftazidime by Conventional and Intracellular Methods
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., August 1, 2004; 48(8): 2999 - 3005.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.