Skip Navigation


JAC Advance Access originally published online on November 1, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
50/6/965    most recent
dkf225v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shannon, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by French, G. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shannon, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by French, G. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2002) 50, 965-969
© 2002 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Validation of the NCCLS proposal to use results only from the first isolate of a species per patient in the calculation of susceptibility frequencies

K. P. Shannon* and G. L. French

Department of Infection, Guy’s, King’s and St Thomas’ School of Medicine, St Thomas’ Hospital, London SE1 7EH, UK

Received 30 April 2002; returned 16 July 2002; revised 9 August 2002; accepted 28 August 2002

Objective: A recently proposed guideline from the NCCLS recommends that results only from the first isolate of a species per patient be used in calculation of percentage susceptibilities to antimicrobial agents. Because this is apparently based on the comparison of various calculation methods for results for oxacillin against a fairly small number of isolates of Staphylococcus aureus, we have applied these methods to a wider range of antibiotic/organism combinations.

Methods: Antibiotic susceptibility results from our hospital laboratory database were analysed. Rates of antimicrobial susceptibility were calculated using the various criteria proposed by the NCCLS, including exclusion of results from duplicate isolates and surveillance specimens from the calculations.

Results and conclusion: Analysis of results for methicillin against S. aureus, gentamicin against Klebsiella spp., vancomycin against enterococci (all in-patient specimens), and amoxicillin and cefuroxime against Escherichia coli (general practice specimens) confirm that, if duplicates and surveillance specimens are excluded, results obtained with the various patient- and episode-based methods for the calculation of percentage susceptibility are very similar. Because of its simplicity and unambiguity, we agree with the suggestion of the NCCLS group that results for the ‘first isolate of a given species per patient per analysis period, irrespective of body site, antimicrobial susceptibility profile or other phenotypic characteristics’ should be used in the calculation of susceptibility frequencies.

Keywords: susceptibility frequencies, NCCLS proposal

* Corresponding author. Tel. +44-207-922-8383; Fax: +44-207-928-0739; E-mail kevin.shannon{at}kcl.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
A. C. Hayward, K. Goldsmith, A. M. Johnson, and on behalf of the Surveillance Subgroup of SACAR
Report of the Specialist Advisory Committee on Antimicrobial Resistance (SACAR) Surveillance Subgroup
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., August 1, 2007; 60(suppl_1): i33 - i42.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
M. Sundqvist and G. Kahlmeter
Effect of excluding duplicate isolates of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus in a 14 year consecutive database
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., May 1, 2007; 59(5): 913 - 918.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
D. Nathwani and on behalf of Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC) S
Antimicrobial prescribing policy and practice in Scotland: recommendations for good antimicrobial practice in acute hospitals
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., June 1, 2006; 57(6): 1189 - 1196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Intensive Care MedHome page
D. L. Green
Selection of an Empiric Antibiotic Regimen for Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia Using a Unit and Culture-Type Specific Antibiogram
J Intensive Care Med, September 1, 2005; 20(5): 296 - 301.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
S.-O. Lee, Y. K. Cho, S.-Y. Kim, E. S. Lee, S. Y. Park, and Y.-H. Seo
Comparison of Trends of Resistance Rates over 3 Years Calculated from Results for All Isolates and for the First Isolate of a Given Species from a Patient
J. Clin. Microbiol., October 1, 2004; 42(10): 4776 - 4779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
J. T. Magee and on behalf of the Welsh Antibiotic Study Group
Effects of duplicate and screening isolates on surveillance of community and hospital antibiotic resistance
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., July 1, 2004; 54(1): 155 - 162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
D. C. Halstead, N. Gomez, and Y. S. McCarter
Reality of Developing a Community-Wide Antibiogram
J. Clin. Microbiol., January 1, 2004; 42(1): 1 - 6.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.